Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

A few months back [before the credit crunch, ie my developer clients tightening there purse strings] I was intending on buying a Picus..

 

Having recently spoken to a few bods in the know they say the Picus can give very inaccurate readings, does anyone have any experience of this?

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

we have one at work, only used it a couple of times but it seemed fairly good to me! both times resulted in fells, rot was there, only hicup we had was when some very thick bark had lifted slightly.. tree wasnt good anyway so no problem there. not heard of any issues with it.

Posted

Lee

CBATrees use both Resistograph and Picus as necessary, following extensive VTA. We find that Picus tomography when interpreted correctly is very accurate based on comparisons with actual presence of decay when tree felled. We test at three heights in the area of suspected decay to provide 3D information of the cone of decay that might be present.

IMHO best way to demonstrate extent of decay to third parties and we use it as often to provide evidence to retain a tree as to felling one.

Posted
and we use it as often to provide evidence to retain a tree as to felling one.

 

Very encouraging to hear this Mr B,

Do your operatives have access to the lite version for aerial inspection?

If so, any observations?

 

 

Thanks

 

David

 

 

 

.

Posted

We have the PICUS Lite and its not light! its exactly the same at the full fat version with a big suitcase full of wires.

 

As for accuracy, I think Dirty Harry said it best... "A man's got to know his limitations."

Posted
We have the PICUS Lite and its not light! its exactly the same at the full fat version with a big suitcase full of wires.

 

As for accuracy, I think Dirty Harry said it best... "A man's got to know his limitations."

 

I agree the Lite is not light! However we can use as many sensors as are needed as long as they are 15cms? apart.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

We carried out a demo today, on an Fraxinus with Inonotus hispidus.

Test height @ 4m, which was below the occluded wound on the rhs of the first picture.

 

The disfunctional portion of the trunk is clearly shown between points 9 and 10 on the diagram, which are the two sensors in the middle of the second picture.

 

Tomograph; courtesy of Ian Isaacs from Sorbus International limited.

59765367434ac_cityoflondon.JPG.859a91e73f3d338723b2fd71d682ce0c.JPG

P7300011.jpg.65a9c86da04dd53b8a8a1af32059963f.jpg

597653673ac45_P71700081.JPG.cc2e197d4e15c5cc91a929e46415cfd1.JPG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.