Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

AA Trade Fair, evening entertainment


nod
 Share

Recommended Posts

To bring it all back into reality, how often do you go out in a team where your groundy is up to speed on modern srt, let alone being able to preform it? I think these guys are thinking a little too hard! We seem to be in an era where everyone and their dog has got an improvement or new technique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think they are thinking too hard, on a daily basis, can your groundy preform any aspect of srt. Or even an ariel rescue for that fact. Whats the point of demonstrating to show how hard it is? They'd b better off not showing the demonstration at all and spending every year touring colleges making sure the students can do the basics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'd b better off not showing the demonstration at all and spending every year touring colleges making sure the students can do the basics.

 

 

I will disagree, as that's not there role in it's entirety. The effective tuition of the basics is something we all desire, in college and in the work pace.

 

Without such individuals we would all be climbing on a taughtline with 3 strand, and slinging a bow saw over our shoulders. There is no requirement to accept new and modified working practices and tool, but without inovation you are usualy left with stagnation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do very much like the new DMM carabiners, the tiny sentinel and the triple lock revolver. Big thumbs up here, although I had seen them before the show.

 

can you post a pic showing how much smaller the sentinel is? cheers:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some interesting points here.

 

What it highlights to me, is the risk of relying on what people show you for work (sales pitch, demo, competition), without entering into an instructional agreement i.e. accountability.

 

Accountability makes sure the instructor explains and agrees the parameters of presentation with an emplyers specific undertaking, advising on suitabililty. This ensures a compensation trail for negligence.

 

The next point is the employer/self employed being responsible for adequate risk assessment of the tools and techniques they would like to employ. Not doing so has a compensation trail for negligence. And then the moral issues.

 

I would recommend anyone serious about work site safety (hopefully everyone), break down to their own satisfaction, exactly what it is they are trying to achieve, then seek a way of doing it with safety, simplicity and efficiency. This may require expert advice where knowledge/understanding is lacking.

 

We should never purchase and use equipment with techniques just because it looks good or we think we can find a use for it, or because we saw someone else do something flashy with it. We need to cover all the angles.

 

This is effective risk assessment. :001_cool:

 

My concern is for those watching demos; sometimes, so many 'new' tools and techniques are being demo'd in a short space of time, without limitations, risks or adequate controls being fully explained.

 

Couple this risk with employers/self employed that may not have the expertise to fill in the gaps and ensure accurate risk asessment and adequate controls.

 

Don't look to demos as solutions, please. They should just be a tool to get us to think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tho I didnt stand and watch this particular demo, I think the idea is open peoples eyes to see a different way of approaching things. I've often found the best way to deal with a situation is the simplest. Keep It Simple, less risk of an error in the setting up, esp in an emergency situation. Saying this, and knowing those who carried out the presentations, they put these scenarios across in a very professional manner, and it does give you food for thought, and a talking point.

As for touring the colleges, well I think the students have enough to absorb learning the fundamental basics, and can always learn more afterwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two points i'm trying to make are that, firstly, i feel that there are people out there whose desire is to be recognised for creating new methods is leading to a scenario where these new styles are of no worth or relevance to an every day work place and do not progress the industry. I fully accept that without innovation there can be no progression. Secondly Andy, i would describe the ability to preform a rescue as a pretty fundamental basic. Wouldn't you agree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.