Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

In my experience (I don't regularly splice any more) a large eye is a bit more forgiving with the final bury.

 

On a tight eye splice sometimes the cover can bunch up a bit of you haven't fully equalised the core/cover.

 

A bit of excess cover in a large eye is less of an issue.

  • Thanks 1

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
On 08/02/2026 at 09:50, Rich Rule said:

I asked Nod a lot of years ago and that was the answer I got.

 

If the spice gets shock loaded there may be a small chance it disrupts the bury and throat of the splice.  At least with a bit more material in the eye, there will be a small amount of stretch before the bury takes the hit.

 

Don’t get me wrong, I used to prefer a tight splice to hold the krab in place but after a discussion with people far more knowledgable than I that is how it was explained.

 

 

 

I phoned Marlow ropes technical department and learned some interesting detail (my rope is a Marlow Draco, so seemed the best choice). He gave a straight no regarding the idea that it helps with shock loading, but had an explaination that works for me.

 

For a splice to give maximum strength, the splice throat angle should be small, that means the splice would be 3x or more, the size of the largest connector used in the eye - a very loose fit.

 

He said with climbing lines, its a compromise, people like a tight eye and it meets the EN standard, its good enough but it is not the strongest.

 

So, experienced riggers, what is the maximum size item that you would clip to a rigging rope?

70kN 12mm steel biners exist, so it still seems excessive.

 

 

Posted

The anchor side of a big ISC or DMM pulley. But yeah, mainly a biner.

 

I doubt anyone’s using these for trees but they exist. 
 

IMG_6350.thumb.webp.31d2b30c67aa4d7bb49fb038d9ecfe6c.webp

Posted
17 minutes ago, AHPP said:

The anchor side of a big ISC or DMM pulley. But yeah, mainly a biner.

 

I doubt anyone’s using these for trees but they exist. 
 

IMG_6350.thumb.webp.31d2b30c67aa4d7bb49fb038d9ecfe6c.webp

I've got two steel fimbles on my cambium saver. 

Posted

Sure. Rigging ropes though. You (probably) wouldn’t be able to poke them through rings. 
 

How does it feel having Marlow back up your hunch? 

Posted
1 hour ago, AHPP said:

Sure. Rigging ropes though. You (probably) wouldn’t be able to poke them through rings. 
 

How does it feel having Marlow back up your hunch? 

Well if their recent splicing cock-ups are anything to go by, it's the equivalent of phoning me for sex advice. 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.