Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Trespass and nuisance roots, severance and liability


Recommended Posts

Posted

It's a total unashamed de-rail (maybe a separate thread required)....  But has anyone seen / got to grips with the NE Biodiversity Metric 2.0 (auditing and accounting for biodiversity - calculation tool) yet?

 

PUBLICATIONS.NATURALENGLAND.ORG.UK

*UPDATE* We have now published a summary consultation response following the end of the beta Biodiversity Metric...

 

I've just seen one associated with a recent AIA and I find it a bit of a mind boggler at the moment.  Needs a good examination and a cross reference to 5837 Table 1.  ?

 

  • Thanks 1

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Expected Remaining Contribution as within the BS5387 guidelines as I read them seems to be the standard/generic reference for any tree graded C level. If the trusty hammer and expert ear backs that up fine and if it impacts that timeframe, then valuable knowing I think. 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, DanR said:

Expected Remaining Contribution as within the BS5387 guidelines as I read them seems to be the standard/generic reference for any tree graded C level. If the trusty hammer and expert ear backs that up fine and if it impacts that timeframe, then valuable knowing I think. 

 

Cat C is '...at least 10 years...'

 

The point I'm trying (probably not very well) to make is that even a decaying tree - hell, even a dead tree - still has a massive, often long term, contribution to make.

 

Totally accept that not all dead trees are suitable for retention (and this may well be the case in your scenario) just trying to present a counter argument.

 

At the very least, if you consider as many counter arguments as possible you'll be better prepared if it does end up with formalities.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Many thanks Kevin, and to everyone for your time and contributions. It's very helpful and much appreciated. 

 

Clearly no case is the same and has to be considered carefully as you say. 

Posted
3 hours ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

(so long as it is accepted that 'contribution' is wide open to interpretation and is continually changing)

I always consider you to be wide open to interpretation.  K

Posted
3 hours ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

It's a total unashamed de-rail (maybe a separate thread required)....  But has anyone seen / got to grips with the NE Biodiversity Metric 2.0 (auditing and accounting for biodiversity - calculation tool) yet?

 

PUBLICATIONS.NATURALENGLAND.ORG.UK

*UPDATE* We have now published a summary consultation response following the end of the beta Biodiversity Metric...

 

I've just seen one associated with a recent AIA and I find it a bit of a mind boggler at the moment.  Needs a good examination and a cross reference to 5837 Table 1.  ?

 

Thankgod fr this. Cos the other one was rubbish and a pain to resolve ( in Unix based systems i use anyway)  k

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.