Trespass and nuisance roots, severance and liability

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

It's a total unashamed de-rail (maybe a separate thread required)....  But has anyone seen / got to grips with the NE Biodiversity Metric 2.0 (auditing and accounting for biodiversity - calculation tool) yet?

 

The Biodiversity Metric 2.0 - JP029

PUBLICATIONS.NATURALENGLAND.ORG.UK

---

*UPDATE* We have now published a summary consultation response following the end of the beta Biodiversity Metric...

 

I've just seen one associated with a recent AIA and I find it a bit of a mind boggler at the moment.  Needs a good examination and a cross reference to 5837 Table 1.  ?

 

[DanR]

Expected Remaining Contribution as within the BS5387 guidelines as I read them seems to be the standard/generic reference for any tree graded C level. If the trusty hammer and expert ear backs that up fine and if it impacts that timeframe, then valuable knowing I think. 

 

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

3 minutes ago, DanR said:

Expected Remaining Contribution as within the BS5387 guidelines as I read them seems to be the standard/generic reference for any tree graded C level. If the trusty hammer and expert ear backs that up fine and if it impacts that timeframe, then valuable knowing I think. 

 

Cat C is '...at least 10 years...'

 

The point I'm trying (probably not very well) to make is that even a decaying tree - hell, even a dead tree - still has a massive, often long term, contribution to make.

 

Totally accept that not all dead trees are suitable for retention (and this may well be the case in your scenario) just trying to present a counter argument.

 

At the very least, if you consider as many counter arguments as possible you'll be better prepared if it does end up with formalities.

 

 

[DanR]

Many thanks Kevin, and to everyone for your time and contributions. It's very helpful and much appreciated. 

 

Clearly no case is the same and has to be considered carefully as you say. 

[Khriss]

Indeed ..... I'll get me hammer  K

Edited October 4, 2020 by Khriss
( IF its where I left it .. )

[Stubby]

1 hour ago, Khriss said:

Indeed ..... I'll get me hammer  K

Go get 'em Thor ?

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

26 minutes ago, Stubby said:

Go get 'em Thor ?

Watching ‘Vikings’ on NetFlix at mo, bloody brilliant! 
 

 

[Khriss]

3 hours ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

(so long as it is accepted that 'contribution' is wide open to interpretation and is continually changing)

I always consider you to be wide open to interpretation.  K

[Khriss]

3 hours ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

It's a total unashamed de-rail (maybe a separate thread required)....  But has anyone seen / got to grips with the NE Biodiversity Metric 2.0 (auditing and accounting for biodiversity - calculation tool) yet?

 

The Biodiversity Metric 2.0 - JP029

PUBLICATIONS.NATURALENGLAND.ORG.UK

---

*UPDATE* We have now published a summary consultation response following the end of the beta Biodiversity Metric...

 

I've just seen one associated with a recent AIA and I find it a bit of a mind boggler at the moment.  Needs a good examination and a cross reference to 5837 Table 1.  ?

 

Thankgod fr this. Cos the other one was rubbish and a pain to resolve ( in Unix based systems i use anyway)  k

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

20 minutes ago, Khriss said:

I always consider you to be wide open to interpretation.  K

I’m easy enough to understand really....

 

You just need the right crypto code ?