Matthew Norman

Hello Back last year I relaunched the local Wales group of the Ancient Tree Forum. Primarily the aim of the ATF is to promote the value and importance of ancient, veteran and other notable trees to landowners, architects, planners, builders etc. in the hope that they seek out experts to retain and manage these trees properly. We aim to run field visits to sites that have ancient, veteran and other notable trees (AVoTs), discuss management, have talks, and just geek out in general. If you would like to be involved in the ATF Wales Group, or simply attend some walk-and-talks, please get in touch by emailing [email protected] I am always on the lookout for venues or sites that have AVoTs, so if you know of any trees that could be considered worty of a visit, please do let me know. Thank you very much. Matthew Norman Trefnydd Grŵp Cymru Wales Group Organiser Email: [email protected] Please support the Ancient Tree Forum to help protect ancient and other veteran trees

I agree that with no TPO there was no crime, and this is why the police have closed their case, citing it as a civil matter not a criminal matter. However, myself and many others, disagree about it being a non-story. This is a story, of how trees with inherent and irreplaceable value, are easily and relatively quickly lost foreever. Working at height hierarchy would expect contractors to use a MEWP before climbing. It seems there was ample space and opportunity for a MEWP to be used. No TPO as the council don't need to protect their own trees. Sacking tree officers wouldn't have prevented this happening, and won't prevent it happening again. We need tree officers now more than ever. The fact that some councils are getting rid of tree officers and putting the responsibility of managing trees onto other departments with little-to-no knowledge of trees is concerning. Local authorities are best suited to managing their own valuable trees. They should take ownership of ancient and veteran trees, be proud to have them, and gain expert advice where needed. Ancient, veteran and other notable trees should be protected, and that is why organisations such as the Ancient Tree Forum and The Woodland Trust campaign to get them protected. I think it's an absolute shame. Ancient and veteran trees provide a wealth of ecosystem services that are often irreplaceable. Once the tree has gone so has the benefits the tree provided. There was no TPO because the local authority owned the tree. The LA doesn't need to protect their own trees from themselves. I imagine the name of the contractor will come out later, similar to how the names of the individuals responsible for felling the sycamore gap tree eventually surfaced. Someone knows who they are.

A similar talk was given by Kathleen WOlf at this year's Arb. Assoc. conference, where she highlighted the benefits of being surrounded by trees and green spaces, especially in urban settings. Really interesting talk. She also mentioned the 3/30/300 rule - which is well worth looking into further, if you're interested in how trees can be good for our health. Webinar 3: the ‘3-30-300 rule’ - Treeconomics

I went up on the Thursday and thoroughly enjoyed it. Due to a change in career this is the first time I've been to the APF show and not been on the lookout for shiny new climbing kit! Bumped into the usual loiterers in the Sorbus tent and had a good chat to. Awesome kit to look at and I am really impressed at the size, reach and scope of some of the tracked spider MEWPS nowadays. Seriously long reaches on some of them. The spinny, twisty chainsaw on a loader was a novel idea, although a bit impractical, I think. Had a chat with FISA and the ICF, too. Saw some colleagues that were there at the same time - which was nice. Can't say I noticed the tiny spiders or influx of mullets as mentioned by others, though. Maybe they came later in the week?

Price is not an issue for myself when purchasing a new helmet. I've always used a chinstrap when climbing, but not when working on the ground. I automatically assume a climbing helmet will come with a chinstrap as standard, so I just expect it in the price. I don't feel they're a faff or uncomfortable to use.

Co-dom stem with included bark and a heavily congested crown? I think your plan for a reduction and trunk bracing may give it a few more years, but ultimately these faults (or features) mean that no amount of remedial work can completely eliminate the risk of failure.

Liquidamber?

I feel that the AA has become more influential if you look at the worldwide interest in the organisation. Many people abroad think highly of the UK arboriculture and forestry industry and the Arb. Assoc., Royal Forestry Society and Institute of Chartered Foresters often have members from other parts of the world. The AA's 'Wednesday Webinar' series was regularly attended by people from all over the world and included talks from industry professionals in Europe, USA, Central America and more. To get the most out of the organisation, as a member or not, you have to put something into it. It's easy for people to sit there and complain about the AA not representing tree workers, or not having influence, or not promoting the industry etc. I find that to get the most out of on organisation you have to actively be part of it. Do something proactive. Get involved. Personally I find the AA helpful, influential and very informative. I have learned a lot from their webinars, and being a member has opened up access to career paths that may have otherwise been out of reach. I have also had chats with the guys and girls that run the organisation and found them to be friendly, knowledgeable and passionate about trees and the industry. Of course, how people value the AA will change from person to person. What I get from it will be different to what another persons gets. Some will not get anything at all and view it as an old boy's club full of stuffy old men in checked shirts. If I were to criticise it I would say that their direct communication could be better and they take so long to implement change or get things moving. There are plenty of ideas but seemingly little action. So, overall, yes - I think the AA is more influential now than it has been previously. It's horses for courses, though, and others may think differently.

Hi Peter-k My thoughts are this - 1. It's your work site. You are the primary contractor and primarily responsible for health and safety of everyone and anyone on your site. This includes any rando's that wander up and start cutting or trying to help without permission. If there was a chance of people outside your work party accessing your site and getting involved then there should have been some sort of barrier or cordon to keep them out. Failing that, work should've immediately stopped and the issue addressed. If anyone got hurt the responsibility would be solely on your shoulders. How would the conversation had gone down if the FiL had got seriously injured? What would have been the outcome to you, your reputation, your relationship with your client, and your business? 2. You were absolutely right to admonish the FiL, but you should've probably done so sooner. 3. Be mindful of treating friends, family or extended family any differently to regular customers. Be professional in all business matters, or you may find yourself being taken advantage of, one way or the other.

Hi Donnie If you know exactly what you want to say, but simply need a better way to say it, you may want to consider using AI as a helpful companion. I sometimes struggle keepng things professional and concise, so I slam my paragraph into ChatGPT and ask it to rephrase it for me. I sometimes need to tweak it a bit, but it usually spits out something that is exactly what I want to convay, in a far more succinct form. Example I typed this into ChatGPT: "rephrase this please: I want to help my mate Donnie write emails that sound fancy and professional in order for him to win contracts and such. I wonder if ChatGPT can rephrase this paragraph to sound any better than what it does?" ChatGPT created this: "I would like to assist my friend Donnie in crafting emails that are polished and professional, enhancing his chances of securing contracts. I wonder if ChatGPT can improve this paragraph's phrasing." Like I said, you do have to know exactly what you mean to ensure ChatGPT provides the right thing, and you may need to tweak it here and there, but it's well helpful I find. Hope that's of use. Matthew

Hi The Timber Titan Have you not been in tree work very long!? So many people assume that their trees are simpy 'too big', without giving any further explanation what they are too big for. Mostly it's blocking their light, or fouling their gutters, or giving roosts to bird to crap onto their cars from. The best ones are the clients that start their sentence with, 'I like trees, but...' I've turned down work because what was being asked would've been extremely detrimental to the tree. Years ago I turned down topping a few silver birches in the back of someone's garden, stating that they're likely to decline from the top down and start losing branches in high winds. I attended the same property last year to find that they had had the work done, and now branches were snapping out in the high winds and the tops were rotting. You decide what's best for you, your business and your finances. If you don't do it, someone else will. Be happy in your decision to walk away, and concentrate on your next job.

Hi Ak280300 From the HSE website: "The Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations place duties on employers to ensure that PPE is: properly assessed before use to make sure it is fit for purpose maintained and stored properly provided with instructions on how to use it safely used correctly by workers" Legally, as long as those key points are checked by each use of the PPE then they're good to go. However, you could raise the question of 'how can I confirm that so-and-so maintained, stored and used this kit properly?' if ever in doubt, don't share.

Hi KBS2021 As per the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations... Employers MUST "ensure that all persons who use work equipment have received adequate training for the purposes of health and safety, including training in the methods which may be adopted when using work equipment, and risks which such use may entail and the precautions to be taken." What that training entails is up to the employer, but the employer must show that the training was adequate for the task at hand. PUWER mentions only two situations that have specific minimum health and safety training requirements; chainsaw use and driving. If anyone is harmed from using a chipper (and the results of being injured can be catastrophic) your employer may well find themselves being prosecuted, fined, and potentially jailed.

Hi Esat Lampeter Tree Services may be your best bet. https://www.lampetertrees.co.uk/ Good luck with your move. Matthew

Hi peds I feel your pain, man. As a dad of three girls with long hair, nits are a flipping nightmare. And expensive to treat, too. We tried the over the counter shampoo and then chucked loads of conditioner onto their hair to make combing the lice out easier, but it still caused many tears and tantrums. In the end we just gave the girls pixie haircuts and told them to keep their heads away from the nitbags they were sat next to. The annoying thing, as mentioned previously, that treating your own kids is near pointless unless the whole class gets treated. That really grinds my gears.