Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Retrenchment Images


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

An oak that we started a (first phase) retrenchment program on a few years ago.

 

No before image (bizarrely) but you can see in the second shot the pruning cuts and also the lower canopy that we will be reducing down towards.

 

We should be returning to this tree in the next year or so to attempt to keep on track with the Individual Tree Management Plan (ITMP) schedule regarding its retrenchment phase.

 

.

IMG_0249.jpg.b098ac5f7707bb1b6ca55709fa0ab9e1.jpg

DSC01078.JPG.5db15285056afe13f2cc199db29ae681.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There must be a whole lot of rot, to removed that much crown!

 

I've seen very few hollow trees that need to have reduction past the second pruning, as shown in an ITMP or by other cautious assessors. And despite 6 years of begging Mr. ITMP, I have yet to hear any kind of reason for going farther.

 

But of course I do not know trunk condition, wildlife objectives, the sociopolitical milieu, and a whole lot more! Plus, if that tree comes out looking like Mr. Hodge's, all good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There must be a whole lot of rot, to removed that much crown!

 

I've seen very few hollow trees that need to have reduction past the second pruning, as shown in an ITMP or by other cautious assessors. And despite 6 years of begging Mr. ITMP, I have yet to hear any kind of reason for going farther.

 

But of course I do not know trunk condition, wildlife objectives, the sociopolitical milieu, and a whole lot more! Plus, if that tree comes out looking like Mr. Hodge's, all good!

 

Guy, we didn't remove that percentage of canopy due to decay (the trunk is actually quite sound) the below image shows where we worked on the 'red' section to rebalance/restructure the asymetrical crown which had been left after significant storm damage some decades before.

 

We did not touch the 'blue ' side of the tree. That particular section of crown has been left to reiterate/rejuvenate on its own,

 

Our 'retrenchment' plan is to bring back in the 'sticky out bit' to produce a more symmetrical lower canopy to lessen wind load on the over extended section.

 

Couple of other images attached to show the tree in its context from 100 years ago.

 

 

.

59766e2f81458_GHBandstand1_05Oct1923.JPG.825d0a45d3798fc4fdd6599f03a73134.JPG

59766e2f7c79a_GHPondBandstand24_24Aug1910.JPG.0e643d0ccd95bbfb382305e548cb5e31.JPG

DSC01078.JPG.0b932f4b440bdb88afdfddad46d67d3c.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.