Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

No-actually thats rather good- in respect of the poor tre being crowded by all that unnecessary rubbish,

 

K

 

( I meant the houses............)

Posted

Coulda used a bit of a thin in the lower crown....just to be picky!!:001_tt2:

Im not a big fan of thinning as it happens...I have used it as a pruning technique on one site predominantly to alleviete light issues for residents of a caravan site. Light levels improve and the feeling of being under "big,scary" /trees is lessened psycologically perhaps..plus there is perhaps less honeydew.....but generally the tree puts on thickening ( quite locally) at those areas of wood that are served by the canopy that remains.....ie, taper is reduced in lateral and scaffold branches and end weighting becomes more of an issue- added to which the "elasticity" of the "mass damping" can only be reduced....just some of the reasons why Im not always convinced its a great idea and certainly not my first choice when considering the options....That said..

Otherwise looks pretty good mate....:thumbup1:

Posted

We applied for thinning out and was refused so had to stick strictly to 20 percent.

 

The problem was massive internal epicormic growth made climbing very difficult.

 

I know exactly what your saying me an the customer agreed to but im not one to piss off the council lol:laugh1:

Posted
We applied for thinning out and was refused so had to stick strictly to 20 percent.

 

The problem was massive internal epicormic growth made climbing very difficult.

 

I know exactly what your saying me an the customer agreed to but im not one to piss off the council lol:laugh1:

 

Cool...sorry to council bash an all tha' but I sometimes think those bods are from a different planet....:lol:

Posted
Cool...sorry to council bash an all tha' but I sometimes think those bods are from a different planet....:lol:

 

LOL Think i agree but if we did not have them we would lose some amazing trees.:ohmy:

Posted

They provide a very necessary service ...I guess its maybe just a case of guarding against over pruning WHU...We all see some shocking work about the place- no doubt mine wasnt all that great in the early days either!!

Its gotta be worth fostering good relations with your local LA Tree Officer- they need to know you can be trusted and are good at what you do....unfortunately there maybe quite a number who have never done the job . They will tend to hide behind the legislation ime....very hard work and best kept at arms length!

As an aside..it would seem the government in New Zealand is all but ready to lift all legislation that protects trees in the urban context.They have a system quite different to ours but this does not bode well as I see it!!

Posted
LOL Think i agree but if we did not have them we would lose some amazing trees.:ohmy:

 

Depends on the council!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.