Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a job where the roots from an Oak are causing problems to the customers garage. In his email he suggested pruning the roots back which for obvious reasons im not going to advise.

What others ways could I solve the problem, I know pollarding may stop them spreading but its a large Oak and wouldn't really want to do that, would reducing it help....?

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Pollarding or reducing will not stop or slow the roots growing. What sort of damage is being caused, direct or subsidence?

 

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Arbtalk mobile app

Posted

i thought that if you pollard, or reduce a tree's canopy it would maintain a root to shoot ratio - meaning that there would be die back of the root system, obvs species depending??? I've had a quick scan on the web and found nothing tho

Posted

I think that idea stems from the theory that the fibrous roots -

That are continually being replaced, may grow at a lesser rate initially, but as the new growth, often with larger leaves and increased transpiration rates, gets established the growth rate returns to normal

Posted

interesting :001_smile: I'm sure i was taught that pollarding a tree was a suitable means for reducing the spread of a root system, and that a lapse pollard can be dangerous for similar reasons....

 

still can't find any info to verify this though

Posted
interesting :001_smile: I'm sure i was taught that pollarding a tree was a suitable means for reducing the spread of a root system, and that a lapse pollard can be dangerous for similar reasons....

 

still can't find any info to verify this though

 

Reducing and constraining are two different things. Small tree = low water uptake requirement = small root spread IF there is sufficient available water. Pollarding or topping a tree, I believe, reduces water uptake initially (lower transpiration levels due to less foliage) but an upsurge in latter years.

 

Spread of root system is probably due more to available moisture than canopy size - compare root systems of comparable trees on sandy /loam/clay soils.

Posted

Roots can't stay static. They are continually moving and growing in their effort to maintain water uptake. I suppose if it were continually pruned incremental growth would be reduced but not stopped.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.