Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Removal of a Horse Chestnut


Scottie
 Share

Recommended Posts

Today I was part of a team taken down a mature Horse chestnut that is suffering from the dreaded pytophara (if is is the wrond spelling I am sorry, but you know what I mean). Well I noticed that it was secreting red goo from the bark but this was only on the "sunny side" of the tree. I didn't notice it in the morning but by 11am approx it was there.

 

Today was warm and I was just wondering if heat has an effect on the disease of the tree, the cambium is thinner so it can come out easier? Is it the tree defence working, trying to push it out? There was no red goo on the shaded part of the tree that I could see. This might seem strange to you but these were my thoughts as we were taking it down.

 

Any response would be good.

 

Thanks Scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Im taking down a chestnut on saturday with pytophara. First time i have ever done one with this condition.

it could be possible that the heat of the sun on the tree makes the red slime less viscose so it flows out easier? or the heat of the sun raises the preasure under the bark and forces the stuff out.

I will have a look on saturday

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess would be that direct sunlight increases transpirational pull, so the pressure in the transport vessels is greater.

 

Also, the tree hasn't had time to photosynthesise enough sugars, so large amounts of stored starch are being released now. Perfect phytopthora food.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could the stored starch be what was spraying all over my leg after I had bored in and then hammered a wdege in? I looked at the bore hole today and there was a huge amount of red goo there. If someone could tell what the proper term for 'red goo' is, I would be grateful.

 

I wish I had my camera to take photos!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we talking bleeding canker? If so its worth noting that the current thinking is that the pathogen is Psuedomonas syringae pv. aesculi rather than Phytopthora...

 

Which doesn't help spelling much! Easier to remember that Psuedomonas is a bacterium and Phytopthora is a mold... (sort of)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.