Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

SRT With DRT Gear question


Recommended Posts

Don't bother trying.

 

I have tried and it doesn't work at all. Not even nearly.

 

Plus, the device may fail and you would fall to the ground.

 

Haha yes it was tongue in cheek hence the :P

 

If it worked people would be doing it.. Im hoping to get a rope runner although I was late to jump in on the SRJ order :blushing:

 

Pretty please can I have one Kevin its all I want for christmas:biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Certain death:001_tongue:

 

They're not designed nor tested for srt use. The lockjack and spiderjack need the additional attachment to allow smooth function. Having said that, I've tried the LJ,SJ, ZZ1 and just a hitch on srt on their own and they all function to a certain extent, though I'd strongly advise not trying to use them!

 

If you want a compact, single device SRT system, get a Hitchiker or a Unicender mate, you can even get a uni over there without everyone thinking you're some kind of voodoo death-defying nutjob:001_smile:

 

I've tried the SJ on SRT and it works to a degree like you said but isn't that great, that's what got my brain ticking

 

The uni is next on the list :) I like the full chaff experience

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you descend ddrt, the descent device is the limb that your rope is over, lockjacks, zig zag, and hitches are really only ascent devices. A rope wrench is like a descent device to work with your ascent device so you don't need the limb. I have found a zig zag + a wrench To be really really smooth.

 

Do not agree with that entirely, a Hitch, ZZ and the jacks in the European market are the few devices designed as work positioning tools which means both ascent and descent. I appreciate your point about the limb but that is the anchor point even an srt system needs that even if it does not rely on it for descent.

 

Do you think the new ZZ was designed with the RW in mind? As they have increased the pivot radius on the link chain, I cannot figure why as it was fine before unless you used the device SRT with say a RW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do not agree with that entirely, a Hitch, ZZ and the jacks in the European market are the few devices designed as work positioning tools which means both ascent and descent. I appreciate your point about the limb but that is the anchor point even an srt system needs that even if it does not rely on it for descent.

 

Do you think the new ZZ was designed with the RW in mind? As they have increased the pivot radius on the link chain, I cannot figure why as it was fine before unless you used the device SRT with say a RW.

 

They are only rated for work positioning on a double line which means that they require the friction from the anchor point to work. But they also supply some friction on their own but they just don't really work on a single line without the aid of something like a wrench. I haven't taken a good look at the new zz. My experience was with the old zig zag and only kn an indoor tree at a trade show. It seemed to work awesome. I think petzl is very aware that many people will be incorporating a wrench. I believe though that if they wanted to just incorporate another zig or zag that the device would probably work just fine SRT without additional friction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are only rated for work positioning on a double line which means that they require the friction from the anchor point to work. But they also supply some friction on their own but they just don't really work on a single line without the aid of something like a wrench. I haven't taken a good look at the new zz. My experience was with the old zig zag and only kn an indoor tree at a trade show. It seemed to work awesome. I think petzl is very aware that many people will be incorporating a wrench. I believe though that if they wanted to just incorporate another zig or zag that the device would probably work just fine SRT without additional friction.

 

It's just a theory of mine that Petzl may of made some changes to better suit the RW although it's probably just as likely another reason for the change.

I never really thought that it's friction these devices need to function correctly more division of load, as in they do not work smoothly when carrying the full weight of a climber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.