Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Redwood topping.


colwoodlandcare
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm sure I read an article a while ago saying redwoods react well to the tops being blown out, il try and find it. Not exactly the trees you want to build a house under , awesome trees none the less

 

I think your right, hasn't the General Sherman redwood had its top blown out at some point in its life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In California many have their tops blown out and regrow. Not sure that that translates to being fine in an urban environment. Having stood beneath General Sherman you realise the magnificence of these trees. Not really suited to a Sussex housing estate though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree they are not suited to a housing estate. It is obviously a remnant of an old country house where they sold the land for housing, while they are there though surely it's better to top and then if needed do it again in 15 years so everyone can enjoy them while they are safe? I hate all this "Arb Nazi" stuff where it's fell and replant all the time 'cos it's not recommended practice. (Especially when it comes to Pops)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree they are not suited to a housing estate. It is obviously a remnant of an old country house where they sold the land for housing, while they are there though surely it's better to top and then if needed do it again in 15 years so everyone can enjoy them while they are safe? I hate all this "Arb Nazi" stuff where it's fell and replant all the time 'cos it's not recommended practice. (Especially when it comes to Pops)

 

Surely a housing estate is not suited below all these big old trees that were there long before the houses?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think that it should be taken into consideration if the trees have that much amenity value yeah, even though I'm sure it was a long time ago so it's a pointless argument, but it's my opinion

 

And I 'spose it's a valid one:001_smile:, pressure of population dictates I guess.

If not there it will be the home of the lesser spotted willow throstler or somesuch.

Edit;

When you look at the houses they could have been built in the 50s or even 30s, I suppose the Redwoods weren't as impressive then.

Edited by Le Sanglier
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I 'spose it's a valid one:001_smile:, pressure of population dictates I guess.

If not there it will be the home of the lesser spotted willow throstler or somesuch.

Edit;

When you look at the houses they could have been built in the 50s or even 30s, I suppose the Redwoods weren't as impressive then.

 

Yup I suppose not everyone looks at them like we do, I guess we're the minority

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trees were planted for a large estate many years ago, there were avenues of them with blue cedars in-between, now all that remains is the odd scattered one and if you are lucky, or in some peoples opinion unlucky you get 3 in your garden.

Its a real shame that when in the planning stage of these properties that there is no consideration or pre thought.

There is an ISA podcast about the whole planning on building ect then the work getting carried out on the trees, in there circumstances things were built then they realised the tree was unsafe and so work had to be carried out, in some cases taking days when if the work was done before what had been built a simple fell of a dead tree could have been carried out, costing much less and being far easier.

 

In these trees i liked working in the 1st and tallest tree at the front of the property, in the end the work which was carried out was any branches sticking out like a sore thumb taken back, thinning where there was high density areas to minimise resistance on branches. Then dead wood and remove rubbing and twisted limbs. The targets below were 1 house, fence and smaller trees.

The 2 smaller trees in the rear were both dead wooded and damaged limbs removed then the top 20ft taken out. Not my personal choice will the height reduction as stated it will re spout causes future maintenance. On the + side i have to do a visual tree inspection for the company that is running the job, so every year ill take the snips up and cut off and new growth.

Both rear trees have a fence running below, 2 green house and a garage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trees were planted for a large estate many years ago, there were avenues of them with blue cedars in-between, now all that remains is the odd scattered one and if you are lucky, or in some peoples opinion unlucky you get 3 in your garden.

Its a real shame that when in the planning stage of these properties that there is no consideration or pre thought.

There is an ISA podcast about the whole planning on building ect then the work getting carried out on the trees, in there circumstances things were built then they realised the tree was unsafe and so work had to be carried out, in some cases taking days when if the work was done before what had been built a simple fell of a dead tree could have been carried out, costing much less and being far easier.

 

In these trees i liked working in the 1st and tallest tree at the front of the property, in the end the work which was carried out was any branches sticking out like a sore thumb taken back, thinning where there was high density areas to minimise resistance on branches. Then dead wood and remove rubbing and twisted limbs. The targets below were 1 house, fence and smaller trees.

The 2 smaller trees in the rear were both dead wooded and damaged limbs removed then the top 20ft taken out. Not my personal choice will the height reduction as stated it will re spout causes future maintenance. On the + side i have to do a visual tree inspection for the company that is running the job, so every year ill take the snips up and cut off and new growth.

Both rear trees have a fence running below, 2 green house and a garage.

Well it's a nice job anyway, out of curiosity where in w. Sussex, (Horsham myself)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.