Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

It's a useful tool sometimes, as long as you know what you are hoping to achieve and what the limitations are.

 

You only know whether it's accurate when you fell the tree and compare the stump cross-section with the scan image!

Posted
It's a useful tool sometimes, as long as you know what you are hoping to achieve and what the limitations are.

 

You only know whether it's accurate when you fell the tree and compare the stump cross-section with the scan image!

 

meaning that the wood could be more dense rather than it looking soft on the scan? if that makes sense....:thumbup1:

Posted

As Paul says, it is a tool (albeit a very useful one...and a tad expensive) NOT a tree inspector and not an excuse for not doing a full and thorough VTA.

 

IMHO oftne used to confirm one's suspicions anyway but can be very useful in tree retention scenarios, i.e. where you're just not sure and the temptation is to remove JIC!:confused1:

 

Cheers..

Paul

Posted

It's not great at detecting decay caused by Kretzchmaria deusta - i.e. tree could be more decayed that the scan shows.

 

PICUS is often requested unnecessarily too. It's only useful for evaluating butt/stem decays, so there's no point in using it when you have a root rot present.

 

We were asked to do a load of PICUS scans on street trees last year. I went and looked at the list of about 20 odd trees but it was only worth scanning a couple of them. How many street trees do you know that fail at the stem? Most go over because of root problems - a PICUS won't help predict that.

 

Have you got a particular tree/situation in mind that prompted the question?

Posted

A PICUS test seemed to work fine for us. It showed we had a tubular Ash tree (50-60% core damage). We've had the crown thinned to reduce the load. Only time will tell!

 

Bosun

Posted (edited)
Does anyone ever get picus tests done,?? is it accurate?

 

Yes:001_smile: No:cursing:

 

Should give a bit more detail, it can be a useful tool but can also be a complete waste of time. Sometimes will need to be used with other methods to back up suspicions.

 

Not always the gods gift to tree analysis.

Edited by treebloke
Posted

But surely a image is better than guess work.i know it's not totally accurate but better than a stab in the dark. It will only aid in your conclusion of the state of the tree.but........as people have said,in the right environment.

 

Jake:thumbup1:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.