Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
I now file the granberg all at 10 degrees and this works well and there's less fiddling about.

 

 

 

:001_smile:

 

Now that would be easier the thought of sharpening two different angles on 36" chain on site has always put me off. l may give the granberg a try when l need some new chains as all at 10 deg sounds better :thumbup1:

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

I'll be trying out some granberg chain in the next few days. Supplied by no other than RobD, good to know it can all be sharpened to 10 degrees.

 

It may be a myth but I heard years back that ripping chain will cut through chainsaw pants:scared1: Have there been any tests regarding stopping ripping chain?

Not heard about the increased risk of kickback though, and I've freehand ripped quite a lot and had more kickbacks off normal chain :laugh1:

Posted

There will be an increased risk of kick back with ripping chain as there are no links that help reduce this. Other than that the structure of the chain is the same

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

There's definitely more vibration risk with ripping chain due to the steeper cutter angle. It's designed to be paring and clearing wood WITH the grain - long xylem tubes up the stem therefore fewer walls to get in the way. This means you're cutting through lower numbers of hard, recalcitrant cell walls every few nm as you do when you're cutting through centuries of xylem vessel creation crossways. That's why axes don't go crosscutting...

 

I also suspect there is a greater risk of kickback if using ripping chains for cross cutting as it will be easier for the chain to 'catch' on the denser wood in the kickback zone, due to it's blunter angle - will have less paring ability than 25-35 deg.

Edited by Rhob the Log
Addition
Posted
There's definitely more vibration risk with ripping chain due to the steeper cutter angle. It's designed to be paring and clearing wood WITH the grain - long xylem tubes up the stem therefore fewer walls to get in the way. This means you're cutting through lower numbers of hard, recalcitrant cell walls every few nm as you do when you're cutting through centuries of xylem vessel creation crossways. That's why axes don't go crosscutting...

 

I also suspect there is a greater risk of kickback if using ripping chains for cross cutting as it will be easier for the chain to 'catch' on the denser wood in the kickback zone, due to it's blunter angle - will have less paring ability than 25-35 deg.

 

 

Good post Rhob - nice to see some theory applied.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.