Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Different cuts for different butts!


Pan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi all - new to this forum and new to milling. I have followed this forum for sometime with interest and thought its about time I joined in.

 

Being a tree surgeon I have good access to lots of different timber and being a keen woodworker have some knowledge with regards to the different properties of wood. I have decided to get into milling in order to utilise my available timber more effectivley. Locally I see so much good timber being wasted for the firewood craze - it breaks my heart!

 

I understand the processes of obtaining tangential boards from plain cuts (through & through). I also understand the process of quarter sawing to produce the more stable radial boards. But are there many variations of the above cuts that suit different species of timber ?

 

Do many of you quarter saw other species than just Oak to bring out the beautiful medullary rays as well as gaining the extra stability ?

 

Do many of you semi quarter saw or produce one square edge timber ie put a breaking cut through the pith of the log and then tangentially saw at right angles to the breaking cut ?

 

What is the best way to saw burrs to reveal there hidden beauty ?

 

How would you saw fruit wood as opposed to say a Yew tree ?

 

Perhaps all of the above is too much hassle and its better to plain saw everything and easier to sticker and stack ?

 

Lots of questions I know, but surely different species have there best features enhanced by choosing the most appropriate cut. Even the most featureless of woods must show different characteristics according to how they are sawn.

 

So come on you expert millers! - can you share some of your secrets to a keen novice who just wants to get the best out of their timber - what are your thought processes when faced with different timbers and how do you get the best out of yours ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Welcome Pan! Some good questions - and really too many to answer and all tricky to answer anyway because most rules are rules of thumb. But I have found:

 

 

  • I'm now quarter sawing for stability - although that said still get through sawn elm (from Big J on here) as I find it more stable to dry.
  • Through saw your very burry timber on one face and then you rotate the log taking through sawn faces of each side depending on how the burrs look... I've just learnt this! Called boxing the heart...
  • Beech has some nice rays in quarter sawn, plane even better.
  • Fruit wood - would prob just quarter saw - but that's because I sell a lot of boards and find a waney edge one side sells best and quarter sawn more stable.
  • I quarter saw straight large logs but knotty ones tend to see how I feel and how it looks.
  • A nice tight crotch (steady! :sneaky2:) through saw to get nice figuring...

 

 

 

 

Don't worry too much how you saw some logs - if you're not sure how to saw a certain log there's prob no best method!

 

 

I'm doing a lot more quarter sawing now for stability, lighter boards to move around, easier to plane, better product at the end of it.

 

 

 

Smaller logs I still through saw though...

 

 

 

 

 

 

:biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Rob

Thanks for reply - interesting to hear how you saw different species, especially how you deal with burr timber. I guess it makes sense when you think about the fact that the best burr will be on the outer layers of a tree.

 

I had hoped that this thread would of created a bit more interest in the milling forum - was it something I said? I guess the rest of the 'Top Dogs' wish to keep their secrets and not pass them onto 'Bottom Sawyers' ! Silly me always thought that was the idea of a forum - exchange of ideas etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't take it as anything personal. There aren't that many people on here who mill, and most who do are only doing it on an occasional basis so there's probably not that much experience to draw on. The other point is that not that many species are saleable, and plain, clear, narrow (up to 8in or so) boards are made much more easily in a commercial mill.

 

This leads to a lot of what's discussed on here being either what came to hand, through and through sawn for convenience, or very wide slabs for table tops etc. which is something big commercial mills often can't handle. Again, these are usually slab sawn through and through.

 

Personally, I've tended to either saw oak for construction (boat or house) with the odd bit of other stuff that turned up. Cherry doesn't seem to show much advantage based on how you saw it and also seems to cope with being through and through sawn surprisingly well, which is handy for getting more wide boards. Holly has nothing to show however you cut it, but is very white for detailing inlays/stringing.

 

As Rob says, plane is worth quartering, known as lacewood and quite a spectacular effect but rather overpowering in large areas.

 

Alec

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Pan

 

Another method of milling which I've rarely seen done, but may be of interest to you and others, is cutting across a log rather than along its length. Of course if you cut straight across, the round disk will almost inevitably split as it dries. But if the cut is at an angle of say 30 degrees (or more), it produces an elliptical shape which is much more resistant to splitting. Might be a suitable way of using logs which are too short for milling into planks, but it really needs a log with plenty of character such as burring or spalted to work well. The burr elm table top in the picture below was bought as an air dried slab 4 inches thick which I then stored in the house for a year until its moisture content had reduced to about 8% after which I reduced the thickness to about 2 1/2 inches to level out the drying distortion. It is almost 4 feet long from a 2 foot diameter log.

 

Andrew

597662fc58567_Dscf0008-Copy.jpg.064da1470d9cd3c0e2b69cadd27d8bf9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Andrew - interesting image.

 

The technique was popular on small logs in the mid to late 17th century, making veneer-type discs known as oysters. These were typically 3mm thick, then laid onto a very stable oak base. I have a huge pile of these I inherited from a cabinetmaker, with no idea what do to with them! Not seen it done on a big scale like that.

 

Alec

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had hoped that this thread would of created a bit more interest in the milling forum - was it something I said? I guess the rest of the 'Top Dogs' wish to keep their secrets and not pass them onto 'Bottom Sawyers' ! Silly me always thought that was the idea of a forum - exchange of ideas etc.

 

 

As said by Alec - don't take lack of interest in a thread personally... I have plenty of threads with no replies... it's not to do with keeping secrets - milling timber is still behind compared to the US and so most people are still getting into just sawing wood through and through... 2 years ago i would not have known what quarter sawing was! :blushing:

 

 

One thing with threads is that you can make it too broad and sometimes this puts people off replying... we all are on arbtalk posting away for an hour or more at a time yet with a stack of paperwork on the desk next to the computer not being done! It's a quick fix with bite size portions being handed around and there's not many that like long posts!

 

 

As it happens ref sawing burr it was another member on here who put me onto that - Big J.... :biggrin: collaborated by another member Watkin!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Pan

 

Another method of milling which I've rarely seen done, but may be of interest to you and others, is cutting across a log rather than along its length. Of course if you cut straight across, the round disk will almost inevitably split as it dries. But if the cut is at an angle of say 30 degrees (or more), it produces an elliptical shape which is much more resistant to splitting. Might be a suitable way of using logs which are too short for milling into planks, but it really needs a log with plenty of character such as burring or spalted to work well. The burr elm table top in the picture below was bought as an air dried slab 4 inches thick which I then stored in the house for a year until its moisture content had reduced to about 8% after which I reduced the thickness to about 2 1/2 inches to level out the drying distortion. It is almost 4 feet long from a 2 foot diameter log.

 

Andrew

 

 

 

It's a great idea and gets a waney edge round the outside... Have tried this a bit on smaller logs but really I should be doing on larger logs... will try again as customers are always looking for the waney edge all round rather than a flat edge at each end!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all - new to this forum and new to milling. I have followed this forum for sometime with interest and thought its about time I joined in.

 

Being a tree surgeon I have good access to lots of different timber and being a keen woodworker have some knowledge with regards to the different properties of wood. I have decided to get into milling in order to utilise my available timber more effectivley. Locally I see so much good timber being wasted for the firewood craze - it breaks my heart!

 

I understand the processes of obtaining tangential boards from plain cuts (through & through). I also understand the process of quarter sawing to produce the more stable radial boards. But are there many variations of the above cuts that suit different species of timber ?

 

Do many of you quarter saw other species than just Oak to bring out the beautiful medullary rays as well as gaining the extra stability ?

 

Do many of you semi quarter saw or produce one square edge timber ie put a breaking cut through the pith of the log and then tangentially saw at right angles to the breaking cut ?

 

What is the best way to saw burrs to reveal there hidden beauty ?

 

How would you saw fruit wood as opposed to say a Yew tree ?

 

Perhaps all of the above is too much hassle and its better to plain saw everything and easier to sticker and stack ?

 

Lots of questions I know, but surely different species have there best features enhanced by choosing the most appropriate cut. Even the most featureless of woods must show different characteristics according to how they are sawn.

 

So come on you expert millers! - can you share some of your secrets to a keen novice who just wants to get the best out of their timber - what are your thought processes when faced with different timbers and how do you get the best out of yours ?

 

Regarding quartersawn, I haven't done any myself yet, but I think that I might give it a go tomorrow. I have a large Oak butt (about 42 inches I think) in the yard and I reckon I'll give it a go. I will quarter it today with the chainsawmill.

 

Speaking of which, I thought of an easy way to quarter a log with a standard Alaskan mill (standard except for longer uprights). Cut straight through the heart, end to end and ratchet strap the two halves together at the far end from where you started and then about one third the way up from where you started. Use a forklift to position the log so that the first cut you did is now vertical and then again cut through the heart, end to end. Should result in four very accurate quarters. These can then be resawn on the Woodmizer.

 

Rob already covered the sawing of Burr - just keep rotating the log so that you are always chasing the flat sawn figure. It's almost the opposite of quarter sawing.

 

No specific method for cutting either fruit trees or Yew. I only every get cherry (as far as fruit trees go) and it's usually reasonable to cut. Can be quite difficult on very old gnarly trees. Yew is always very hard and demands a slow and patient cut, and a very fresh band.

 

Regarding getting the best out of my timber, I have found that I really do prefer to take larger logs than smaller. I like to halve them with the chainsaw mill and then mill the halves. This results in a board where the centre of the log has been removed, resulting in much more stable drying. Best size of log for me is 36-45 inches.

 

Here are a couple of pictures to illustrate this:

 

DSC_0532.jpg

 

DSC_0542.jpg

 

DSC_0818.jpg

 

Jonathan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.