Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Elf n Safety


windfall
 Share

Recommended Posts

So if he had a silky and not a saw would he still be in trouble for doing it????

 

If the employee on ground wasn't using a chainsaw, then I don't see how he could be in trouble. If the bloke up the ladder was happy that the ladder was steady, and he was maintaining, as far as practicably possible, 3 points of contact, then all should be good. And also, the HSE snitch probably only made an appearance because he heard the chainsaws next door!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 219
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Andy, the "system" is always wrong, it's the easiest target.

 

I disagree, the "System" could have won easily with such a cut and dried case. They had the guy bang to rights on every count. Given just those facts, I dont think there is one level headed person in here who would have jumped to his defence. but no one likes a sneak, a grass, a snitch, a rat. The case would have never got anywhere without that man reporting him and sending photographic evidence. If a cop pulls you for speeding 33 in a 30, you listen to him explaining why speed is dangerous, you take the caution and you slow down for a while. If a resident took a photo and sent it to the police, youd be slightly miffed, and it would be doubtful if it would even get to court as it would probably not be admissable in a court of law. I feel this case could have been handled in a much more proactive way, getting the point across to all around that such practises are outdated and downright dangerous in the modern world. i make no defence once again for his role as an employer not treating his employees legally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha, well.... it says "Ladders are normally only used as a means of access into the crown of the tree" - Not "Ladders must ONLY be used....". The reason it says "normally only used" is because work in the crown of the tree typically requires a lot of moving around and you'd normally be up there more than 30 minutes. BUT for a 20ft tall twig of a tree being dismantled you certainly would be doing much moving around in the crown and spending much time up there. Few minutes of chop chop chop with the Silky......

 

Ahhha but in your ladders page it says

 

Ladders can be used if after assessing the risks the use of more suitable work equipment is not justified because of the low risk and short duration
.

 

Well I can't see how tree felling can be described as low risk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Treequip, I get that you are enjoying a civil debate about the use of ladders regs.

 

So with due respect and nothing personal....

 

But who cares, the regs are bollocks:001_smile:

 

Well there is a landscaper that cares, well he does now:laugh1:

 

There are also plenty of people out there who do care, they accept that regulations are a fact of life and chose to deal with it.

 

The way the law is framed there also plenty of people out there who response positions of responsibility so they have to care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there is a landscaper that cares, well he does now:laugh1:

 

There are also plenty of people out there who do care, they accept that regulations are a fact of life and chose to deal with it.

 

The way the law is framed there also plenty of people out there who response positions of responsibility so they have to care.

 

You may have hit the nail on the head here.

 

As a one man band, I do within reason what I like.

 

As an employer, you are bound by this utter crap. This stuff will hurt productivity and safety.

 

Because you have the associated costs, your team has to do more jobs,... working quicker than me and less safely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may have hit the nail on the head here.

 

As a one man band, I do within reason what I like.

 

As an employer, you are bound by this utter crap. This stuff will hurt productivity and safety.

 

Because you have the associated costs, your team has to do more jobs,... working quicker than me and less safely.

 

Or they could charge more, the companies that are bound by tiers of regulation expect tht a job will cost more because of the hoops to lump through. Most sites have half a ream of paperwork and a mornings worth of induction for the smallest of jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or they could charge more, the companies that are bound by tiers of regulation expect tht a job will cost more because of the hoops to lump through. Most sites have half a ream of paperwork and a mornings worth of induction for the smallest of jobs.

 

I may be a one man band but I'm not cheap:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.