Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • 0

What to do about hole in tree


Gulfcoasttoad
 Share

Question

We have recently moved in, and a large chunk of concrete has fallen out of the tree in our front yard (in Texas). A quick web search revealed that the concrete method was a bad idea in the first place, but this was probably done 20 years ago by the previous homeowner. There is still some concrete left. Should I leave it or remove it? What should I do with the remaining cavity? Thanks in advance for any ideas.

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1331735413.538882.jpg.93935ecc87f8f1d9affbc16b2619d3be.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1331735400.226851.jpg.5e548e748d69f0e947a3a0e3b73064b5.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1331735388.799686.jpg.458bdec22c70a840e4f7b55451fac4d7.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1331735372.117549.jpg.edd9cd803a22b278029ff4a1c8efeeb3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • 0

Don't I know it, I have been surveying trees on the edge of a notorious housing scheme in Glasgow for the last 5 months and cavities seem to make an irresistable stove for alfresco drinkers to sit around. Not because they are veteran trees, but because they are just out of sight of police. Many of the cavities have been caused by fire damage between butresses a few years previously. Honestly, a couple of nights drinking and a bit of fun for the winos is enough to seal the fate of trees that have been there for a good 100 years before the scheme was even thought of and would otherwise have been tehre for another 200 years.

Any metal over the cavity would have been prised up to make a handy toasting rack.

Scum!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Tony's advice was responsible. Giving retention options did answer the op.

Tree had been raised above house but no thinning above that so it is overdue.

It's condemning based on 'glaring defects' (which might not be costing that much strength) that's questionable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
Tony's advice was responsible. Giving retention options did answer the op.

Tree had been raised above house but no thinning above that so it is overdue.

It's condemning based on 'glaring defects' (which might not be costing that much strength) that's questionable.

 

This thread's knocking on a bit Guy, how did you happen upon this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You really need the advice of a tree arborist. They can look at the tree and tell you exactly what is wrong and what you need to do. If the tree is diseased or infected with insects it could come down in the next wind storm. They can tell you that. Diseased or infected trees are not always easily ‘seen’ so seek professional advise. We cannot correctly diagnose it from the internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.