Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

The amazon- unnatural histories!


Tony Croft aka hamadryad
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

agreed, but there is also an aspect of global trade that matters, that countries are more inclined to work together in the global interests for eachother as apposed to just for themselves. so say if the amazon is the lungs of the earth and benifits europe we have some trade benifits in which to encourage conservation there. why trade imbargos work.:thumbup:

 

very true, and we rely on global trade for products we can't produce ourselves. Population size is really the problem, and thats not going to stop increasing in the near future!

 

The problem with deforestation these days, is it happens too quickly and too aggresively. But when someones going to make a pound or two there'll always be somebody who'll be there doing it no matter what the ehtics are.

 

Its a great shame and i think your right promoting a trade platform that encourages sustainable use of resources has a higher possibility of effecting a sustainable response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep that was very interesting indeed:thumbup1:

Just shows that the ancient cultures knew how to live in harmony with the environment and not destroy everything around them in the name of progress. Humans nowadays have such a big problem that there is just too many of us to live like that. There is not enough space for so many people and there comes a point where we do more harm than good to our surroundings imo. Great programme Hama cheers for posting:thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not if like the amazonians we can live amoung the trees and actualy manage the habitat in ways that INCREASE its yields and biodiversity!

 

I feel Alan Rayner is wholey or "holey" as he prefers! right about "lost knowledge/wisdom":001_rolleyes:

 

Ahh, but even the program made the point that the indigenous Amozonian peoples could only support a limited sized community. Once the community became too large, the patch of jungle in which they lived was no longer able to sustain them. the earth became exhausted, and bush meat became scare.

 

Once this became the case, these communities could of course move on and set up camp in a new area of forest and start afresh, in the knowledge that their old site would over a period of time recover from the stress placed on it by their former habitation.

 

With the encroachment of "industrial civilisation" and the clearance of the rainforests this is becoming harder and harder for the few remaining tribes that eschew the modern world in favour of their traditional lifestyle to be able to do this.

 

But of course sustainability of the environment is not the only issue, living without all mod cons, a large dietry option and the lack of health care, means that the indigenous people generally have a shorter lifespan, and have a much higher infant mortality rate which mean that are more able to live within the means that their environment provides.

 

Modern humans are over populating at an exponential rate that is intensively raping the earth of its limited resources faster than it can recover. Sooner or later there will be a tipping point, the ramification of which would probably be felt globally on a biblical scale. Perhaps nuclear armageddon as we fight over the last glass of drinkable water and last slice of edible bread!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh, but even the program made the point that the indigenous Amozonian peoples could only support a limited sized community. Once the community became too large, the patch of jungle in which they lived was no longer able to sustain them. the earth became exhausted, and bush meat became scare.

 

Once this became the case, these communities could of course move on and set up camp in a new area of forest and start afresh, in the knowledge that their old site would over a period of time recover from the stress placed on it by their former habitation.

 

With the encroachment of "industrial civilisation" and the clearance of the rainforests this is becoming harder and harder for the few remaining tribes that eschew the modern world in favour of their traditional lifestyle to be able to do this.

 

But of course sustainability of the environment is not the only issue, living without all mod cons, a large dietry option and the lack of health care, means that the indigenous people generally have a shorter lifespan, and have a much higher infant mortality rate which mean that are more able to live within the means that their environment provides.

 

Modern humans are over populating at an exponential rate that is intensively raping the earth of its limited resources faster than it can recover. Sooner or later there will be a tipping point, the ramification of which would probably be felt globally on a biblical scale. Perhaps nuclear armageddon as we fight over the last glass of drinkable water and last slice of edible bread!

 

Thats what i was trying to say but with less words:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO, the program made the point that europeans brought disease and the population crashed, it made the point that the small scale situation was not what existed before, that in fact large stable long term communities existed

 

very true but not as large as we would conceive as large nowadays, the numbers of population they were talking about doesnt even come close to a large modern city and they are talking about the entire amazon area which is way bigger than any city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the worst human atrocities were the missionaries. As soon as they got people living in perminant settlement and persecuted people for using local medicines and herbs, whole cultures were lost. In the end even people who wanted to return to a sustainable live style were unable to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

very true but not as large as we would conceive as large nowadays, the numbers of population they were talking about doesnt even come close to a large modern city and they are talking about the entire amazon area which is way bigger than any city.

 

5 million plus peoples in the river basin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.