Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

by classifying trees this way though, trees of a "veteran" nature are overlooked (IMO) due to them not being pigeonholed in the ancient status because of their young age

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
by classifying trees this way though, trees of a "veteran" nature are overlooked (IMO) due to them not being pigeonholed in the ancient status because of their young age

 

And they are also overlooked by the TPO legislation because they have the appearance of a dying and diseased tree. This is such a shame because they have almost made it to ancient status and chop.

 

I think the 'system' whatever that is, should be able to identify important veteran trees and give them protective status just because they are veteran.

Posted
And they are also overlooked by the TPO legislation because they have the appearance of a dying and diseased tree. This is such a shame because they have almost made it to ancient status and chop.

 

I think the 'system' whatever that is, should be able to identify important veteran trees and give them protective status just because they are veteran.

 

 

:thumbup: agreed

Posted
the bit where a birch of 100 years is a veteran. it is not it is an ancient and a young ancient.

 

where one cannot veteranise a tree, we can and do. in fact it happens to urban trees alot:thumbdown:

 

where a yew of 600 years is a vet? come on, 1000 years maybe!

 

But your earlier post said that all ancients have more veteran characteristics than you can shake a stick at:confused1:

Posted
But your earlier post said that all ancients have more veteran characteristics than you can shake a stick at:confused1:

 

yes i did didnt I! silly me, lets say that SOME ancients can be so vital and healthy despite thier age that few of the typical characters associated with veterans exist. take this agent birch from staverton for an example, it is MINT:001_cool: ancient yes, but veteran?:001_huh:

 

59765e2ec55ed_staverton2118.jpg.bd81d182031439b6f1bc746bfbc65ea9.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.