Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

root protection area help


jim11
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am having trouble working out the rpa, is there a simple way other than bs5837 way because im sure when i studied it at college we measured the stem diameter in mm and x by 12 but then i cant remember what we did with the end result to get it into metres. Any help would be greatl recieved- maths is not my strong point as you might gather. Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Take the stem diameter in mm. Multiply by 12. Divide by 1000 (to convert mm in to metres). You now have the radius (half the diameter) of a circular RPA.

 

If you want to work out the area of the RPA in square metres, take the radius figure and square it (multiply it by it's own value) then multiply by 3.142 (Pi).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how acceptable it would be but you could simply say the RPA is 12m radius (based on a tree with a diameter of 1.0m, i.e. 12x 1.0m = 12m radius), perhaps too simplistic but avoids the calculation to find the area.

 

The trouble here is that the RPA is often not a circle and hence application of the 'area', to best fit the particular situtaion, is where you as the expert come in.

 

Lastly NJUG 10 (superceded by V.4 I beleive) used to talk about the dripline, i.e. edge of the crown, OR 4 times tree girth, whichever is the greatest, as the root protection zone. Never far out in my expereince.

 

Cheers..

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I generally use the 12x stem diameter "halo" around trees in the first instance. You really need to have a good reason for drastically offsetting an RPA away from the default circle (such as a fixed barrier, like a wall or building, a limiting factor like an abrupt change in soil type or a slope). That's not to say that roots don't offset, because they do, but unless you're Airspading to determine the root area, I think it's best to keep your offset assumptions conservative.

 

I've seen the area vs circle approach used fairly disingenuously to wildly alter and greatly limit radial RPAs by unscrupulous arbs to squeeze buildings in between trees on development sites. I don't think this is in the spirit of the standard, and should be constrained by the 20% maximum offset (for individual trees) in any event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.