Neighbour's application to cut back my tpo'd tree

[LilyLangtree]

2 hours ago, Mark Bolam said:

Because they can take pictures, usually.

 

3 hours ago, Mick Dempsey said:

My comment was not really aimed at you Lily, no offence. 

 

Honestly this garden/border dispute has lost all interest for me. 
I am not sure what more can be said about it

Ok, thanks for what you've said so far.

[LilyLangtree]

2 hours ago, Oldfeller said:

you have been politely asked 8 times  to contribute a photo or two to assist in people understanding your problem more, surely you have heard of the often used phrase "a picture is worth a thousand words"

so far you have ignored those requests.

The man is aggressive, I don't want to post a photo or my location.  I just thought I could get some advice on whether or not the Council would allow the tree to be cut back when there is a boundary dispute.  Thank you all for replying.  

[Mick Dempsey]

38 minutes ago, LilyLangtree said:

The man is aggressive, I don't want to post a photo or my location.  I just thought I could get some advice on whether or not the Council would allow the tree to be cut back when there is a boundary dispute.  Thank you all for replying.  

Ok, figured as much. Seems fair. 

[LilyLangtree]

34 minutes ago, Mick Dempsey said:

Ok, figured as much. Seems fair. 

My comment was not really aimed at you Mick.  No offence.

[Canal Navvy]

I assume that you have thoroughly read his T.P.O. application to the planning authority 🤔

[Oldfeller]

1 hour ago, LilyLangtree said:

The man is aggressive, I don't want to post a photo or my location.  I just thought I could get some advice on whether or not the Council would allow the tree to be cut back when there is a boundary dispute.  Thank you all for replying.  

If he is aggressive, it would be prudent to have photographic evidence of that aggression, in video  format, I don't blame you for not wanting your location revealed, but nobody has asked for that anyway.

the council would be the best to ask about their intentions, regarding this matter don't you think.

and please answer me this, if the disputed boundary was reinstated as you say your  documentation shows, would any of the tree be over that boundary and encroaching his side of it.

[LilyLangtree]

2 hours ago, Oldfeller said:

If he is aggressive, it would be prudent to have photographic evidence of that aggression, in video  format, I don't blame you for not wanting your location revealed, but nobody has asked for that anyway.

the council would be the best to ask about their intentions, regarding this matter don't you think.

and please answer me this, if the disputed boundary was reinstated as you say your  documentation shows, would any of the tree be over that boundary and encroaching his side of it.

I've seen his application, he wants to cut the tree back to where he believes the boundary is but there's the original low wall between the tree and his land.  He wants to grab land to put a shed on.  I've spoken with the tree officer today and he said that whilst he understands my concerns they don't take boundaries into consideration but cutting the tree back that much would not be allowed anyway.  

[Oldfeller]

24 minutes ago, LilyLangtree said:

I've seen his application, he wants to cut the tree back to where he believes the boundary is but there's the original low wall between the tree and his land.  He wants to grab land to put a shed on.  I've spoken with the tree officer today and he said that whilst he understands my concerns they don't take boundaries into consideration but cutting the tree back that much would not be allowed anyway.  

I thought the boundary position had been verified, the true boundary, not the one he claims.

so I'll ask again, how much if any of the tree is protruding over the boundary.

 

[LilyLangtree]

12 hours ago, Oldfeller said:

I thought the boundary position had been verified, the true boundary, not the one he claims.

so I'll ask again, how much if any of the tree is protruding over the boundary.

 

I'll say again, the boundary has been verified by a RICS boundary surveyor and none of the tree is encroaching on his land.  He just wants to grab a bit more land for his shed.  He's just crazy.

[GarethM]

31 minutes ago, LilyLangtree said:

I'll say again, the boundary has been verified by a RICS boundary surveyor and none of the tree is encroaching on his land.  He just wants to grab a bit more land for his shed.  He's just crazy.

And yet I still feel it's jist half a storyline, why would he think it's his.

 

A cease a desist legal letter from a solicitor perhaps, as I don't think a surveyor report is worth the paper it's written on regardless of who asked for it to be done.