Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Training / Books: Tree Species & Characteristics Relevant to our Industry & Climbers


Jamie Jones
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Steve Bullman said:

That could get very clunky and confusing Paul, so many variables. Would be interested in how you think that could work though?

 

Yes the image is illustrative. I'll be wanting to include plenty of text, but i'll probably move it further down the page and keep the key info at the top. The tabs will allow people to jump straight to the relevant section without having to scroll down a long page also.

 

Tackling the user interface is going to be the tricky part. As for getting all the info together, well that could drag on for years! A worthwhile project though

 

Hi Steve, was just a "thought out loud" of a way to have a quick reference...but doing so would perhaps detract from reading and learning...and I do acknowledge it would be subjective (but it could be rationalised(?) by having a number of experienced people determine a rating and then take the average...BUT, point conceded!) 

 

Thanks Steve and I look forward to seeing it develop...thanks.

 

ATB

Paul

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Sorry Steve, I don't understand your question / point about "how to implement it".....do you mean what criteria to apply and how to do so consistently?

 

If so I hadn't envisaged it being do so technically, more here's 20 common tree species - grade them 1-5 (safe to unsafe) and then take an average (directed to either a select group OR a "poll" for 2 weeks where anyone can rate them...dunno.)

 

Sorry mate, have to 'sign off' now..

 

Cheers n look back tomorrow.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AA Teccie (Paul) said:

Sorry Steve, I don't understand your question / point about "how to implement it".....do you mean what criteria to apply and how to do so consistently?

 

If so I hadn't envisaged it being do so technically, more here's 20 common tree species - grade them 1-5 (safe to unsafe) and then take an average (directed to either a select group OR a "poll" for 2 weeks where anyone can rate them...dunno.)

 

Sorry mate, have to 'sign off' now..

 

Cheers n look back tomorrow.

 

 

Yep got that part...it was the mention of fungi. I assumed you meant there should be a sort of secondary scale for how safe it is when colonised by each fungi. That would result in loads of different figures. I think the easiest way would be to list all associated fungi with the tree and link them to the relevant fungi in the fungi section. The same thing will happen on the fungi section, each fungi will list trees that are affected and they will in turn link back to the correct page on the tree section. This could result in a bit of back and forth but would keep each section a bit cleaner I think.

 

Hope that makes sense

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Steve Bullman said:

Yep got that part...it was the mention of fungi. I assumed you meant there should be a sort of secondary scale for how safe it is when colonised by each fungi. That would result in loads of different figures. I think the easiest way would be to list all associated fungi with the tree and link them to the relevant fungi in the fungi section. The same thing will happen on the fungi section, each fungi will list trees that are affected and they will in turn link back to the correct page on the tree section. This could result in a bit of back and forth but would keep each section a bit cleaner I think.

 

Hope that makes sense

 

Thanks Steve.

 

In practice, and I stand to be corrected (as always), and perhaps other than Innonotus in Ash, and maybe Massaria on LP, I'm not particularly aware of fungi being a safety issue / factor when climbing...but more potentially when felling (partic. ADB.) 

 

Hence my thoughts here were simply to list commonly associated fungi, perhaps including aerial or basal occurrence such that the reader can decide whether to read further with the links you include. I wasn't thinking anything more here and certainly wasn't thinking of rating these.

 

Cheers..

Paul  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.