Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Dying ash woodland and felling licences


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, The avantgardener said:

Any of the trees that are resistant it would coppice and come back anyway wouldn’t they?

Would they? I think that young/juvenile growth is more susceptible to the fungus so it begs the question whether a healthy, vital tree that is resistant/tolerant would still be physiologically so, after having been cut off at the knees. 

 

I don't know if it's been around long enough, in the UK, that there's actually an answer to that question.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

52 minutes ago, Gary Prentice said:

Would they? I think that young/juvenile growth is more susceptible to the fungus so it begs the question whether a healthy, vital tree that is resistant/tolerant would still be physiologically so, after having been cut off at the knees. 

 

I don't know if it's been around long enough, in the UK, that there's actually an answer to that question.

Big ‘J’s site clearly needs to be clear felled in order to do the job safely, so maybe he can give us some answers on the coppice regeneration at a later date.

I presently have a site that we coppiced 2 years ago that was heavily infected and clear felled, there are lots of stools showing very vigorous growth with no signs of the disease yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, The avantgardener said:

Big ‘J’s site clearly needs to be clear felled in order to do the job safely, so maybe he can give us some answers on the coppice regeneration at a later date.

I presently have a site that we coppiced 2 years ago that was heavily infected and clear felled, there are lots of stools showing very vigorous growth with no signs of the disease yet.

That's surprising, you'd think that the ascospores present would rapidly re-infect any new growth. I based my previous reply on a recollection that I have that new foliage/young foliage seems particularly susceptible - I may be acting on a false memory entirely though. I think it is going to be a steep learning curve with this disease and the best ways of dealing with it is still to be learnt. 

 

One thing that I don't know, is the differences in regeneration between stools cut to the ground and those left higher. I wonder if there is any differences in re-infection rates between high and low stools. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, saintsman54 said:

any Hurley potential in the sticks?


Not really, no. Generally a bit too big I think. I'll reexamine them again with hurleys in mind. I always forget to consider the hurleys.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.