Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

The article only makes brief mention of one of the most important factors to bear in mind when considering CE marking - in the majority of cases, it is a SELF CERTIFICATION process conducted by the manufacturer for their own product.

 

Important to highlight this because unscrupulous manufacturers could  appear to satisfy the standard through producing an adequate paper trail, but cut corners in source materiels, manufacturing process etc...  

 

Easily done - as was demonstrated with significant adverse safety and health implications in the PiP breast implant scandal where industrial, rather than surgical, silicon was used in manufacturing.

 

There is also the matter of easy 'copy representation' of the physical 'CE' mark by manufacturers passing off cheap copy products of genuine articles.

 

If you buy from a car boot / Sunday market should expect to get mugged off, if you buy from a well established retailer you should be in safer territory.

 

Worth considering also - BSI 'kite mark' is only achieved and awarded after a product has been independently tested by a BSI laboratory.

 

http://www.technologystudent.com/prddes1/kite1.html   

 

Always good to see a safety related blog / post :thumbup1: 

Posted
1 hour ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Easily done - as was demonstrated with significant adverse safety and health implications in the PiP breast implant scandal where industrial, rather than surgical, silicon was used in manufacturing.

 

 

Worth considering also - BSI 'kite mark' is only achieved and awarded after a product has been independently tested by a BSI laboratory.

 

http://www.technologystudent.com/prddes1/kite1.html   

 

Always good to see a safety related blog / post :thumbup1: 

I don't know how to split Kevin's original to insert comments but agree with it all.

 

I was tasked with producing a technical file  for a piece of kit made in Germany but modified in UK, The PTO was adapted off the engine in a non standard manner such that it exceeded the torque the engine manufacturer allowed, not a safety issue but could prove expensive if it broke so I said it didn't meet the standard. Upshot was the german firm issued a CE mark for it.

 

Not Chinese Export more like Caveat Emptor

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.