I have two nests on my land. The first nest was evacuated and I spotted spur marks going up the tree, so nothing good had happened there. The Raptor club people said it was unusual for people to take eggs now, so I am guessing the climb was not to ring birds but probably just their necks. People usually shoot the nest with a shotgun according to them, but with me/neighbours so close, this charmer went for a more direct approach.
They or some others moved to a second nest. Birds fledged and the adults, as said above, are sharp eyed and noisy; if you go to have a look, you have to go quietly otherwise there is a warning cry and the chicks duck down and the parents try and lead you off by calling and flying in large circles.
Then it all went quiet. Then a young fledgling started flying around crying and making a lot of noise. It's done so for about 2 weeks. I checked the nest; gaff marks up the side. Parents and other chick gone.
When we first found out about the goshawks, I phoned the local Raptor club up. They were really keen to know where they are, to come and ring them and do whatever else makes them happy. But when I asked about protecting the second nest, they were completely bl**dy useless. Nothing. So I'm doing my CS38/2013, I'll be getting a license to disturb and I will be putting up cameras - and not some academic with a spreadsheet to fill. As sort of pointed out above, I don't want other people with constant video coverage of my land thanks.
I'm on the verge of a rant - so I'll continue. (Get some popcorn folks)
I ask if there is anything I can do to protect them. "Sure, cease all operations within 450m". Question to the floor: how big is your garden?! 450m covers our place, an agricultural yard, a number of paddocks and fields, 5 public footpaths, about 12 neighbours, three busy roads and a pub. And as soon as I tell any of them about the nest, in theory they can all be done if they 'recklessly' do what they normally do, or in other words disturb the nest. Bearing in mind the goshawks were happy to nest there "as is" (and in places like Germany, they are an urban bird).
The point of this venting is that if people who are masters of their own window box, but nothing else, invoke laws affecting people who have actual land, they need to be sensitive to the unintended consequences. I stopped work immediately on our land and have done what I can to protect the nests, despite the fact it has set me back by 4 months. I've kept quiet so that the birds don't get more enemies amongst the locals. But despite that, it looks like someone has taken the law into their own hands because of the risk the birds will affect them (be it on their shoots, their businesses etc) or because they just want eggs/birds- and those who profess an academic interest in the birds appear unwilling and unable to do anything to assist, but are happy to turn the landowner and all living close by against the birds by spouting pointless restrictions better suited to the Scottish wilderness.
I feel better for that. I'll feel even better when I catch the b*stards climbing my trees next year.
Rant over.