
Andrew L
Member-
Posts
130 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Classifieds
Tip Site Directory
Blogs
Articles
News
Arborist Reviews
Arbtalk Knot Guide
Gallery
Store
Freelancers directory
Everything posted by Andrew L
-
TPO work permission granted but with a "note"
Andrew L replied to Andrew L's topic in Trees and the Law
I am hesitating to add this to the mix in anticipation of the comments it might generate but here is the response to my query about climbing plants, from the Assistant Arb Officer: " Dear Mr ******, Thank you for the recent clarification which resonates with what I believed to be the case. However, could I ask you to please review the final sentence of your advice: "Consent would be required before removing any climbing plants from the canopy or the main stem." This goes against everything I thought I had learned during my HND course at Merrist Wood (which was admittedly, a very long time ago?!)." His response (yesterday): "The removal of climbing plants is not listed within the list of exemptions as laid down by HM Government. The removal of climbing plants could result in damage to the main stem or major limbs. Therefore, consent would be required before proceeding with these works." Confess, I am beginning to wish I had not opened this can of worms,,, A -
TPO work permission granted but with a "note"
Andrew L replied to Andrew L's topic in Trees and the Law
Agreed. I have written back to the "assistant arb officer" to seek clarification. I suspect it was a typo and he neglected to write "not' (there were a number of other typos and he wrote it late on Friday afternoon,,,,). We shall see. -
TPO work permission granted but with a "note"
Andrew L replied to Andrew L's topic in Trees and the Law
And isn't this the main problem here? We are arb professionals are trying to work legally and so ask for guidance from the local council regarding specific TPO'd (or CA'd) trees. But although there is a national tree protection legal framework, it is apparently interpreted by each council differently, increasing confusion to both the tree owners and us? -
How To Remove A Tree Stump - Infographic
Andrew L replied to Artemis Tree Services's topic in General chat
Coming late to this party but: Should not the infographic talk about scanning the ground for services before grinding? What about screening and signage to protect windows and the general public? And 3rd party Insurance? Surely these are the things that make a company differ from the cowboys? Although to be fair my stump grinding course did not say anything about CAT scanning 🙄 -
TPO work permission granted but with a "note"
Andrew L replied to Andrew L's topic in Trees and the Law
And, a response from the council: "Dear Mr Linney, I refer to your message that has been passed to me. I can inform you that the information you refer to is given as guidance only, it does not imply that consent is automatically granted to cutback any overhanging branches without first specifying these works within an application. We have had several instances where a tree owner has complained that their neighbours have carried out works to their trees without first informing them (the tree owner) of the proposed tree works. Dead or dangerous trees may be removed as an exemption, however you are obliged to provide 5 days written prior warning before carrying out the proposed works, this is known as “a 5 day notice”. All 5 day notices are registered as an application. If after 5 working days you have not received a response you may proceed with the necessary works. If the works are considered to urgent (they cannot wait 5 working days) then you are advised to take digital images before taking the necessary action. Deadwood may also be removed as an exemption likewise broken branches. Consent would be required before removing any climbing plants from the canopy or the main stem. I hope this information is of assistance. Yours sincerely," For me the only surprise is "Consent would be required before removing any climbing plants from the canopy or the main stem." I thought ivy etc was not covered by a TPO,,, Andrew -
TPO work permission granted but with a "note"
Andrew L replied to Andrew L's topic in Trees and the Law
Thanks all for your insights on this. In answer to various comments above: Yes. Both trees are within the client property boundary and so the debate is purely hypothetical but the householder is clearly very keen to make use of whatever options to improve the light to her property. There is substantial and sustained (spade?) damage to the cherry tree roots which I believe has caused die-back to the tree and I duly documented this on my application but this aspect was not even mentioned on the permission: did the TO even go and look?! Who knows? Cherry tree prune at this time of year? Well I was originally contacted back in ~May 20. No response from householder for at least 3 months after quote sent in. First application for works to the council denied. This order gives 2 years to complete the work,,,, But it is interesting that I have yet to see a TPO with a species-specific time of year prune recommendation. However, it is my understanding that both cherry and mountain ash are ideally pruned late winter-early Spring. If and when our learned colleagues at the council do respond to my request for clarification, I will update here. Cheers and thanks again Andrew -
TPO work permission granted but with a "note"
Andrew L replied to Andrew L's topic in Trees and the Law
OK Just sent this to my local council,,, "Dear Sir Many thanks for your recent email giving permissions to work on the 2 TPO trees identified. I note that the email with these permissions also gives advice in relation to branches from neighbouring trees whose branches overhang boundaries "Neighbours may abate the nuisance of overhanging branches by cutting back to, but not beyond the boundary without necessarily having the permission of the tree’s owner." Given that this note is added to a TPO grant of works, it would appear to indicate that an overhanging tree branch may be pruned back to the boundary even if a TPO applies to that tree ie that council permission is not required. Could I please ask if this is what is intended by this note's inclusion to the TPO permission? My understanding was that a tree with a current TPO in situ could only be worked on without prior permission from the local authority if: 1 It was immediately dangerous to person's or property 2 The removal of deadwood and ivy was all that was being undertaken I would be very grateful if you would please clarify." Let's see what they say. A -
TPO work permission granted but with a "note"
Andrew L replied to Andrew L's topic in Trees and the Law
Absolutely, but my point is that when this note is tacked onto the end of a TPO permission of work, it implies that the TPO is not required: which is exactly what the householder tried to tell me when I first went to the property. Andrew -
Dear experienced colleagues, Just had a TPO letter of approval arrive by email from my local council with an additional note, which I think is confusing. Cut n pasted below, all identifying names etc deleted. "Proposed works: Cherry tree ~remove any deadwood and crossing branches, and reduce the crown height by 1-2m. Mountain ash - deadwood and remove minor crossing branches only to maintain shape and tree form. Following consideration of your application, XXXXXXXX District Council, as the District Planning Authority, pursuant to powers in the above legislation, raises no objection to the above proposal as follows: Consent is granted to carry out a crown clean to one Cherry tree located within the front garden and reduce it in height by up to 2 metres. Consent is also given to remove the dead wood and crossing branches to one nearby Mountain Ash, which is all as applied for. This decision is subject to any informatives shown below: (1) Works hereby permitted should be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the current edition of BS 3998 by a competent person. (2) The tree works hereby approved shall be completed within two years of the date of this decision notice. Please note Neighbours may abate the nuisance of overhanging branches by cutting back to, but not beyond the boundary without necessarily having the permission of the tree’s owner. However, it would be polite to discuss the matter before starting work and you should offer back what you cut. If you are proposing to carry out any other work to a tree that is not on your own land, you should seek permission from the landowner before starting work." In my opinion, the note after the TPO appears to imply that council permission is not required if a neighbour's tree has annoying branches and so there's apparently no need to even find out if the tree in question is subject to a TPO?! Which to my current understanding is absolutely wrong. Be grateful, as ever, for your thoughts on this Andrew
-
No worries: I told you I failed maths O level first time around. Thank you for putting me straight. A
-
Update: Youngest birthday has gone very well, she is v happy. I have engaged a bookkeeper who will pick up my receipts on 2/1/21. My work site landlord is happy for me to apply for a Op licence: I am guessing I should be applying for a restricted licence? Planning to do a leaflet drop in my road at least after checking costs before putting out the advert in the local paper. I know almost everyone on my lane, so I don't think there will be objections,,, Meanwhile, struggling with a quote for 140 Lombardy Poplars to be reduced by 50%. Height varies from 50-80ft, tree condition variable. Square plot, road and BT line down one side, farm access and buildings down 2 other and a footpath on the last. Have identified 3 local chip sites, and made contact with the local council re TPO. Defo no CA etc. Back to the hospital tomorrow, hoping for a quiet day,,, A
-
I am in Sevenoaks area. It's my youngest daughter's birthday so got to go. Thanks for all advice: excellent. The felling near-miss was because I was doing 2 jobs cos of C19. Fulltime NHS ie 12 hr shifts plus commute as well as the tree jobs. I never intended to do this, and was hoping it would stop but here we are. Groundie? Yup, no real harm done, so lucky but it easily could have been a game-over thing, in so many ways. Truly hope he gets himself sorted though,,, Andrew (RGN, RNc, ENP and ex Emergency Planner, so I was expecting the Pandemic, just didn't know when,,,
-
Ta muchly. Have a waste carriers licence already. Was just looking up the Regs: from what I read it seems to be that if I attach a snow plough to the front of it, its exempt from needing an O licence,,, Seriously, best speak to the site landlord. A
-
Good idea and I have grandpa rights, licence wise: but doesn't a 7.5t truck mean I need an Operator licence for the work site?
-
Be gentle with me, it's my first time,,,, OK, deep breath, cards on table. 33 years almost full time NHS (mostly CN A&E), dual qualified, MSc blah blah blah but last 8+ years struggling in a job I detested being a bed manager at a well-known children's hospital. Probably partly because of the grief from the job, the missus kicked me out about 5 years ago. But when I had my own hair n teeth, I used to be a tree surgeon and I had been keeping my hand in around the NHS job. And so, Feb 19 I resigned from the NHS, borrowed £30k over 5 years, bought a 03 plate tipper Transit, an ex-demo TP155 chipper and a 2nd hand stump grinder. Me and the now ex were competing for GB at age-group triathlon, so my fitness/age wasn't an issue. 18 months down the line. Good: The job is mostly great. Don't mind getting wet. Like being outdoors. Enjoy the climbing challenges and like the feedback from doing a good job (absent from NHS job). Debt paid off (with govt bounce-back help), I have a healthy order book and growing customer base. I have been steadily increasing my skill set so now have CS 32 & 40 on top of the basic tickets and put one of my groundie's through his 30. The TP has been mostly reliable but its warranty runs out in Feb 21. This summer I have also bought a 22 ton capacity towed splitter which I bring to bigger jobs to reduce humping about useless softwood lumber and just fire it through the chipper. I use the Arbtalk chip website and have yet to pay to offload chip. Work landlord: Very lucky to have a great worksite. Own secure space for tools and truck/chipper, handy skip burn site and even has an engineer also on site for the inevitable breakdowns etc. Bad: The paperwork, just hate it. Due to C19, I went back to the old NHS job and have been sending my crew out to do non-climbing hedging jobs etc. I have been letting invoices slip sometimes over 3 weeks, which is crap but now up to date. Bank balance is healthy but I am now waaaay behind on it and the 31st Jan deadline is looming. I have decided to splash out on a bookkeeper to help. Groundie's: Hard to find good one's. Just had to let one go: Kit constantly being mysteriously broken but no-one 'fessing up to it. Used a lowering rope and then discovered a 50% "nick" in it halfway along its length, ffs. He'd told me about a forthcoming court case but not any detail: he neglected to tell me he'd been told not to have contact with kids. When challenged he said he hadn't had any contact. Well, he had met mine and a customer's last week: off you f*ck (with a full day's pay for half a day's work, cos I'm soft). The Transit. It has been mostly reliable but it is so slow: we have big hills round here and with any load at all it drops to 1st gear. Its had new clutch, battery, 2 outer rear tyres, windscreen, and the water pump gasket has just let go. But it has just passed its MoT and I only hoped it would last 18 months, so not complaining. LOLER: Due to C19, finding it hard to get my climbing kit checked. Now way out of date but planning to sort this/next week. Legality: Very aware I am constantly climbing w/o a 2nd climber. Truck is always over-loaded as soon as any chip goes in there. All my tickets are up to date (30/31/32/38/39/40/41 plus stump grinder n 1st Aid) but groundie's are mostly worked "under supervision" or whatever. Near misses: There have been a lot. Bust head of fibula May 19 taking on a nasty hung-up tree which I didn't want to do but needed the work. Lucky to get away with only a day off work (confess I quite enjoyed telling the ENP in ED what was wrong at triage: she didn't believe me cos I was still walking ;). Pretty sore climbing with spikes the following week but doable. Working flat out, knackered: managed to top myself out of a tree ie hinge and back cut applied and I am tied into the top. Groundie's not paying attention either,,, Only still here because tree hit the floor before the rope got tight on my harness (felling from about 12 ft up). Scared the crap out of myself once or twice but I like adrenaline and its why I left the NHS job. So, background over: crossroads. Debt paid off. £12K in my business account (less this year's tax bill tbc). I have been thinking about getting a 4x4 pickup to replace the Skoda estate which would mean I could pull a tipping trailer (still to be bought) which could either be a back up tipper and/or could take plant to bigger jobs Or Do I replace the truck with something newer, safer (for my guys) and EU6 compliant (I have a London job to quote for, the exclusion zone is coming out to near me in Sept 21)? I'd be grateful for your thoughts Andrew
-
Coming to this late but "260 working days in a year"?? Je ne comprends pas. 5 days a week 4 weeks a month 12 months or 5x4x12=240 (but I did fail my maths O level first time around,,, ) Otherwise I agree with what you are saying. Looks like a days work and £750 for a 3 man crew seems reasonable particularly if you are not having to take the timber away. Confess I do struggle with pricing, though. Andrew
-
-
Be aware the Regs are changing very soon. From memory large scale production has to be certified by March 21, small scale March 22 I believe. And it's a complete ball-ache. You have to demonstrate how you are drying the wood, and storing it so that the customer is burning it at less than 20%. Your drying method has to be compliant with latest emission regs,,, Got to get truck MoTd in 35mins but will try and find the Regs later,,, Honestly? Very difficult to make a living from it without investing very heavily to buy serious kit. Margins are going to be tight. Andrew
-
Just had a big glass of wine, so please forgive spelling/syntax issues,,, 1st year's Ltd company accounts are due in 22/8/20 after a 3 month C19 extension. My accountant has asked for £1500 up front plus £200/hr (ffs). In his pdf splurge (12 docs in total: as if I don't have anything else to do), he also sent me docs that were clearly for another company. I sent him 8 questions via email 6 days ago but have not received a response. My accounts are with him but he is waiting for my signed whatever-the-f- it-is commandment which he got wrong (one of the questions). I have been with him for about 2 years now, as a sole trader and have never been impressed. Can anyone recommend a good, honest, dependable accountant? Is it possible to get a set of accounts turned around for HMRC in 3 weeks (all my numbers are in EXCEL format, all receipts time ordered and filed). Cheers A Kent, J4 M25 if location matters
-
Yeah, tell me about it. Silly cow kicked me out of the house to screw her married boss and now she's on her own and can't work in traffic any more (she loved it there, such a shame). Best thing she ever did from my viewpoint!
-
Spud Thank you. Very helpful. So I have found out that because I was cautioned by the Trafpol at the time of the offence, the 14 days waiver thing does not apply. I am apparently looking at a Band C or D or maybe E fine + a ban likely for a month but could be more, it all depends on the Magistrate. Naturally I will go to go and plead everything I can think of and I have looked into paying for a specialist solicitor to help but haven't done anything yet. Maybe I should give my divorce solicitor a ring tomorrow, she was brilliant dealing with the ex's b-s (who happened to be a traffic cop ). Trying to prepare last year's accounts just now, which is another story,,,, Cheers A
-
I have really done it now,,, Working away, locked down. Called back to old NHS job (I resigned April 19 to set up tree business) and so got the KTM Duke 690 back on the road. Working at Evelina Children's, St Thomas' and it was good to be back seeing everyone again. Roads were lovely and clear,,,, So Monday 27th April going home. Off the Old Kent Road is an overpass that does a nice right hander before dropping back onto ground level. Its one-way, no pedestrians, no turnings,,, and I usually do go a touch quick around it. I have never seen a traffic car near there before. So you can guess what happened,,, bit more throttle than usual, round the bend, coming down off the ramp and spotted the cop car. Hard on the brakes+++. Pulled over. Very polite coppers. Showed me the laser gun reading: 71mph, in a 30. Oh f*ck. And then I started thinking about it as I rode home. OMG! Clean licence. 7 years NCD on the car. Truck is insured for anyone over 25yrs old so its not a complete disaster. But here's the thing: nothing has happened. No letter, nowt. I have asked around and apparently it can take months. I completely accept it's my fault. Just going too quick. And the funny thing is I chose the Duke because it wasn't too fast (tops out at 115mph) but it does have a massive mid-range and I clearly have no self control,,, Its the waiting that's the worst,,,, A
-
Probably a stupid question but,,,, Do you get high winds out there "in the middle of nowhere"? The reason I am asking is I can't see what is holding the roof structure to the framework. I am no engineer but it occurs to me that if there was a strong wind, the roof would act as a massive sail and could be lifted off unless it had tie-down straps. Apologies I am stating the obvious and I just can't see them on your pic. A
-
30/31/32/38/39/40/41 LOLER up to date Called back to NHS for obvs reasons but now available Ring/text 07920 078458 Andrew
-
Looks like Sevenoaks, Kent from his previous postings,,,