Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi. Sorry if this is a bit of a daft question. When it comes to HSE regs, training etc., is there a difference between a dedicated mewp and a telehandler with a mancage attachment? We have both at the place I work, and currently the telehandler is used in preference to the Niftylift because it is perceived not to require the same level of servicing, operator training etc. I can't see the difference, to be honest. Surely a mewp is a mewp, whether it's a dedicated piece of kit, or an attachment.

 

Does anyone know the answer, or where I would find out?

 

Thanks very much

 

Lynette

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

I have used a Telehandler and man cage. When using a man cage you can only operate the boom and must keep the Telehandler stationary when there is someone in the cage. This makes getting to multiple locations on a tree tricky and slow. Telehandlers generally make quite a bit of mess on wet ground especially if you have an uncarefull operator.

 

The telehandler must have a loler inspection every 6 months if it is to be used to lift people.

Posted
I have used a Telehandler and man cage. When using a man cage you can only operate the boom and must keep the Telehandler stationary when there is someone in the cage. This makes getting to multiple locations on a tree tricky and slow. Telehandlers generally make quite a bit of mess on wet ground especially if you have an uncarefull operator.

 

The telehandler must have a loler inspection every 6 months if it is to be used to lift people.

 

I thought that when someone was in the basket only they could control the handler, and that for a baskt to meet regs it must have controls? I remember a lock out in the cab of some sort- maybe the steering, but may have been the joystick- in a 9m merlo where i used to work, which i think was to do with a basket.

 

Coincidentaly, i was held up today by a gang on roadside tre work using a handler with a basket- i never looked in the cab...

Posted

Thanks everyone that's answered. I've had a good look through LOLER and it could certainly be clearer (but then I guess that would make it all too simple, wouldn't it?). There's no question in my mind, but I can see how someone wishing to avoid the cost of 6-monthly inspections could argue that a forklift is not 'equipment for lifting persons'. I can feel a frank exchange of views coming on. Ho hum.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.