Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
Red buckeye-aesculus pavia

 

Still convinced it's a S. sargentiana. The description matches what I see in Flora of China - Sorbus sargentiana in Flora of China @ efloras.org.

 

The leaflets are starting to turn the classic yellow/red autumn colour of s. sargentiana, starting from the edge and that reddish sticky bud is a give away.

 

Leaf veins match, and it has large leaves for a Sorbus. Stout twigs/branchina and a small to medium size tree. This particular individual obviously didn't fruit well this year, because if there was fruit cluster that would be a key diagnostic feature also:

 

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sorbus+sargentiana&espv=2&biw=1517&bih=714&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMIjceUiszlyAIVS9gaCh2Pgw0R&dpr=0.9#imgrc=_

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Still convinced it's a S. sargentiana. The description matches what I see in Flora of China - Sorbus sargentiana in Flora of China @ efloras.org.

 

The leaflets are starting to turn the classic yellow/red autumn colour of s. sargentiana, starting from the edge and that reddish sticky bud is a give away.

 

Leaf veins match, and it has large leaves for a Sorbus. Stout twigs/branchina and a small to medium size tree. This particular individual obviously didn't fruit well this year, because if there was fruit cluster that would be a key diagnostic feature also:

 

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sorbus+sargentiana&espv=2&biw=1517&bih=714&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMIjceUiszlyAIVS9gaCh2Pgw0R&dpr=0.9#imgrc=_

Yeah its the lack of fruiting clusters thats got me doubting your ID,im no expert just flicking through some books and putting up some species that match the photographic profile.

Posted
This tree looks to be Sorgus sargentiana, large pinnate leaves and what look like sticky reddish terminal buds.

 

 

 

Lovely species, one of the nicest in the genus.

 

 

Are you sure. I'm still confused about this one. It does look similar but still not 100% on it.

Posted
Can anyone give me a reason as to why it is not a Tetradium daniellii? It the closest thing I could find but its not a species I have come across before.

Thanks for the help

 

Tetradium danielli has smooth beech tree like bark,where as this specimen looks as though the bark is rough or a fissured texture.Also the leaves barley change colour in the autumn only going to a slight yellow,where as this tree seems to be going through a really noticable change in colour.If it had berries on it i would be more inclined to agree with you to its ID.

Posted
Tetradium danielli has smooth beech tree like bark,where as this specimen looks as though the bark is rough or a fissured texture.Also the leaves barley change colour in the autumn only going to a slight yellow,where as this tree seems to be going through a really noticable change in colour.If it had berries on it i would be more inclined to agree with you to its ID.

 

Which further strenghthens the case for s. sargentiana. I know it's shocking to see a rowan species that has nice bold foliage. I think its the lack of close up of buds and no fruit corymbs which would give it away. The general 'stout' appearance of the twigs and tree absolutely give it away as sorbus sargentiana.

 

What context is this tree in? arboretum? park?

Posted

There's a S. sargentiana at Harcourt Arboretum I saw in teh summer. Here's pics. It was grafted onto what I think was plain S. aucuparia. Hence the last two pics showing suckering foliage typical of S. a.

DSC_3303.jpg.4eb89f5deec5088055c813c2981fd753.jpg

DSC_3302.jpg.7178b5519418294e56505534021d0db9.jpg

DSC_3304.jpg.e75af734097c6f7e730fb656d450cab9.jpg

DSC_3301.jpg.52d5b254d832936e23f80561ee3c9e61.jpg

DSC_3299.jpg.e3bd8a0d04a59b55386a1cea61bf50d3.jpg

DSC_3298.jpg.567463b87388144831c20a56f11cbe3b.jpg

Posted
There's a S. sargentiana at Harcourt Arboretum I saw in teh summer. Here's pics. It was grafted onto what I think was plain S. aucuparia. Hence the last two pics showing suckering foliage typical of S. a.

 

Yep, foliage seems to match, although the buds on this one appear green I'm still positive the original picture is of s. sargentiana, there are a few related species eg. s wilsoniana and s. insignis, but it doesnt fit. This species is typically grafted onto s. aucuparia rootstock.

Posted

Second image in Dalton trees also shows, the basal leaflets, which is characteristic in s. sargentiana and other related Rowans. If original poster can take shot of these then it could be more diagnostic.

Posted
Second image in Dalton trees also shows, the basal leaflets, which is characteristic in s. sargentiana and other related Rowans. If original poster can take shot of these then it could be more diagnostic.

 

Agreed...

and nice detective work my friend!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.