Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Girdled roots


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Been keeping an eye on this old horse chestnut and its associated decay 'issue' for a few years.

 

But its interesting to note that due to being overtly fung-centric my focus has not lingered on the obvious girdle at the site of the lhs Rigidoporus fruit body :001_rolleyes:

 

 

 

.

DSC03727.jpg.77840d6a8ca6dca2f918d9627f9a0df0.jpg

DSC03745.jpg.05526f6bb35142d8b0082b7dc4661e04.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Would perhaps hide an eyesore, but not entirely sure it would do much else?

 

Slow dessication, and all the other D's that follow.

Enable interior parenchyma cells to generate new cambium--faster sealing.

 

"Might cut back the left hand side of the bark to where its not loose to enable & promote callous regrowth

 

Not much loose to trim by the looks of it but ok.

 

Far more important to Find the Flare! :grinning-smiley-003

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But its interesting to note that due to being overtly fung-centric my focus has not lingered on the obvious girdle at the site of the lhs Rigidoporus fruit body :001_rolleyes:

 

The above has got me to thinking & reviewing previous (ongoing) cases

 

Shots of a reduced beech (from 5 years back) which has Meripilus.

 

First noted the fruiting on this tree about 10 years ago.

Its still fruiting each year & continues to be a viable retention, imo.

 

 

.

P9120003.JPG.af6dd13b47018486a4f29cd29f0ef3d1.JPG

597664c910b28_HGbeech.jpg.c3360a379248801a2cf41966785595ee.jpg

DSC09639.jpg.10d68776111fe877b279ce1d66b34d41.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shots of a reduced beech (from 5 years back) which has Meripilus.

 

 

 

The 'air'cavation uncovered a number of partialy grafted and ungrafted girdles & evidence that the decay was mostly concerned with the older lower root system.

 

The girdles will undoubtedly be having an effect on the vascular flow, root vitality & the trees ongoing battle to regenerate new roots to keep the balance of new (over) & old (under) tree, optimal.

 

 

.

DSC02122.jpg.65faf0a1a186adbc872835381e9b9d9d.jpg

DSC02092.jpg.bf52d0368b46c51ad1d96abf83b66f18.jpg

DSC02088.jpg.b8a20899d502d11a1384bde5c4bf93b8.jpg

DSC02087.jpg.d4639fb9f7e8ebe3d29f4615a719e9ef.jpg

DSC02059.jpg.dc6f5b8d7942ddd96e157855fff2063f.jpg

DSC02078.jpg.33d48452aa91318948ec5db991240052.jpg

DSC02107.jpg.903efb7c61ba9cfbacc3f60c91e62947.jpg

DSC02100.jpg.3a8582cfa942566b9929808ce75ff428.jpg

DSC02073.jpg.a2d5fa9fb019cae7b97a2bfd1797af4d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess its no real suprise that when you start looking with connective glasses on, girdles, dysfunction & decay are often heavily associated.

 

 

.

Gorgeous documentation thanks :thumbup:

 

What we need are connective glasses with fungicentric and vta lenses

 

Arbotrifocals! :001_rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liking this one Guy, thought it very worthy of sharing the link here.

 

A Practitioner's Guide to Stem Girdling Roots of Trees

 

Fine nod to it in your July '07 TCI mag piece on root prunning :thumbup1:

 

http://www.tcia.org/PDFs/TCI_Mag_July_07.pdf

 

 

 

.

Yes Johnson and Hauer did good documentration there, but being university guys they left it to others to describe practical solutions. :sneaky2: Hauer and others were later questioning the practice of ungirdling buttress roots. The consensus seems to be that if stem tissue is not girdled then retention should be considered. On your beech

 

"The 'air'cavation uncovered a number of partialy grafted and ungrafted girdles & evidence that the decay was mostly concerned with the older lower root system.

The girdles will undoubtedly be having an effect on the vascular flow, root vitality & the trees ongoing battle to regenerate new roots to keep the balance of new (over) & old (under) tree, optimal."

 

it's a tough call. The tendency would be to favor those pathways that seem to contribute the most to codit. Where guesswork seems to be more in play than decisions based on evidence, then doing nothing is one policy.

But ungirdling everything that is not grafted does save the tree energy, and striving for that old-new balance seems quite reasonable. It depends...:001_rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.