Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Girdled roots


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

Fantastic thread. Are there any cases where it can be proved that "un-girdling" has resulted in an improvement in tree health. I'm not doubting it helps.

 

With so many variables, it depends on the level of 'proof' you're after.

Research by Tate (1973) and Smiley document crown improvement after removing girdlers.

 

Here's the elm that was root-pruned in 2007. A 2009? pic on page 4 here: http://www.historictreecare.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/LBG-III-Managing-Stem-Girdling-Roots1.doc.pdf

 

Pruning wound-red pin- closed 1"/year. The 2 green pins show points on buttresses where compressed bark was traced/scraped down to phloem. These same points have the greater outward growth, as shown in volume and the biggest flaking bark plates above. Blue pin marks point where restored growth appears to be overgrowing the inclusion. :thumbup1:

 

It's understandable to avoid wounding, but worse wounding comes from included bark, which is inevitable if compressed bark stays in place. I know the practical pendulum has swung away from 'surgery' and intervention', but in this case it maybe oughta swing back a smidgeon.

597664b99eac2_IMG_84181.jpg.54c64fcfef5ba03485b77c9c5fb4bbb7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

so, in the previous post looks like a mowing machine got a bit too close.

 

Is glyphosate really all that bad? :confused1:

 

and in this one the maple had some pruning done with a truck it seems,

 

and no one straightened the roots or took that wooden stake out

 

why the removal? crown looks good dunnit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so, in the previous post looks like a mowing machine got a bit too close.

 

Is glyphosate really all that bad? :confused1:

 

and in this one the maple had some pruning done with a truck it seems,

 

and no one straightened the roots or took that wooden stake out

 

why the removal? crown looks good dunnit?

 

 

Not a mower Guy, perhaps the scale is not obvious. (My bad, should add something in to shot for context)

This is on a tightish footpath bend where large vehicles (tractors etc) navigate too closely. Damage has been caused by a very big tyre.

 

 

The removal does appear arguably unnecessary.

Not entirely sure what the replacement strategy is of that authority.

Somewhat random, from the number of the ailing trees that I see that do get left to linger in poor condition too long.

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a mower Guy, perhaps the scale is not obvious. (My bad, should add something in to shot for context)

This is on a tightish footpath bend where large vehicles (tractors etc) navigate too closely. Damage has been caused by a very big tyre.

 

Unlike this one from a couple of days where it is the incompetence of the mower operator :thumbdown:

 

 

 

.

IMG00906-20130521-1532.jpg.8553eb430e39257f47257597af9c5c50.jpg

IMG00905-20130521-1532.jpg.035416472e966be505cec3aa10fe0ea2.jpg

IMG00904-20130521-1531.jpg.ab6d0ee3f9c7110453d7b89368e85e91.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlike this one from a couple of days where it is the incompetence of the mower operator :thumbdown:

 

 

 

.

Also in that shot the incompetence of the istaller is on display; buried flare. :thumbdown: re band-aid, tacking the bark back on might arguably do some good.

 

I cannot think of a reasonably arguable pupose in removing that street tree. Assessors tend to judge a book by its cover. Branch scars are irrelevant to structure; roots could be fixed , or ignored, either way the tree is viable, maybe for a good long time.

 

Unless I am missing something? :confused1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also in that shot the incompetence of the istaller is on display; buried flare. :thumbdown: :

 

Although 5 years ago, I don't recall this or its neighbour opposite having a particularly pronounced flare.

 

perhaps the remnants of the degraded mulch is producing an optical illusion?

 

.

P1070003.jpg.3d2758ef33e3fc0815d7dc67a7cb27f8.jpg

597664c833d12_P1070003(2).jpg.83f744543893d10011859beb3e2514bb.jpg

597664c831676_P1070002-Copy.jpg.044842fc33980a3a8838eeb2a7dc6bac.jpg

P1070002.jpg.428dc5c6c50466aad978decf32841499.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just needs a band aid.......

 

re band-aid, tacking the bark back on might arguably do some good.

 

 

Would perhaps hide an eyesore, but not entirely sure it would do much else?

 

Might cut back the left hand side of the bark to where its not loose to enable & promote callous regrowth

 

.

597664c839319_IMG00906-20130521-15321.jpg.fb8d76c89539048342e588d46970db29.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.