Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Glyphosate and trees


Tom Joye
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi,

anybody has got any information on the effect of using glyphosate in the root zone of trees? In contradiction to common beliefs, glyphosate apparently does accumulate in the soil and in the tree, but I do not find much (scientific) information on this topic.

Thanks in advance,

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Glyphosate is a Foliar Acting, Systemic Herbicide. It is therefore designed to be mixed according to instructions and foliarly applied, the plant then takes the chemical to its root system and therefore kills the plant.

 

The chemical was originally designed and patented, marketed only under the brand name of "Roundup". After the patented period expired many other companies started marketing the chemical, also as a stump killer.

 

It is safe to use under tree canopies for weed treatment, however contact with foliage at lower concentrations can still scorch trees, shrubs and hedges, but should not affect bare stems.

 

In high concentration it will kill stumps and brush, but is a crude way of doing it as transfer is possible to other plants.

 

Hope this helps a bit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted in another thread that it kills of mychorrizae and that you'd get reduced growth as a result, and promised phenom that I'd find the reference where I'd read about it. Looked high and low in my papers and on the net and can't find any articles on it.

 

With regard to it being foliar acting, there is dispute over whether it should work as a stumpicide. Logicaly, if applied to the leaves it would travel thru the tree to the roots using the trees vascular system. So any method of introducing it into the vascular system should work.

 

As Stoner says it was Monsanto that originally patented it, when the patent expired they developed GM roundup resistant crops, in order to keep a handle on the market for the product in agriculture.

 

I've read that there are soil residues but, can't find references. Will probably have another look now.

Edited by Albedo
change stockers to stoner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote 18 stoner -It is safe to use under tree canopies for weed treatment,

 

 

I would dispute this, for reason mentioned above, but admit I don't have the evidence. Might be an idea to try to nail this one as its used for vegetation control around trees, we've all done it.

 

The question would be, do mychorrizae have a mechanism for ingesting glyphosate? Does the foliar acting bit mean, via stomata thru evapotranspiration mechanisms, and if so what mechanism do mycho's have to do the same

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it was developed as a foliar herbicide, but I know some street trees that died because of herbicide accumulation in the soil and in the plant. Two herbicides were identified: amytrol and glyphosate. So I'm pretty sure it might actually kill a tree, even without foliar contact, with only soil accumulation. And that's why IMO no herbicides should be used in the root zone of trees (or at all actually).

But up until now it's more a gut feeling than based on scientific data. So that's what I was looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you should spray the root zone of trees until at least the third year after planting.

 

Spraying a square metre or so around newly planted trees using glyphosate is very, very common forestry practice, and is often done for the first three years after planting. I do a lot of this each spring, and I can't say I've noticed that it's been having a bad effect. If I choose the herbicide, I normally choose glyphosate because the risk of run-off is lower, the product breaks down into reasonably safe compounds and it is normally the safest for the operator (some glyphosate products do not even carry a CHIPS label). My personal belief is that a directed spray will not harm young trees, providing it is applied as instructed on the label. 4 l/ha product is normally enough for most situations; lower doses can often be used, depending on what weeds are present.

Edited by Quickthorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.