Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

I took a sample last night of the fungi pictured from an old oak i recently worked on. The fungi was found at approx 40-50 ft. It was growing in a shallow cavity where a large'ish branch had died back which i removed leaving the callus intact. There was soil-like material present in the cavity.

I went back up the tree last night to retrieve a retrievable ART that didn't want to be retrieved on the day of work!

Sorry about the quality of the pictures, and the semi decomposed state of the fruit bodies which i forgot all about until now.

Any ideas what it is?

DSC00140.jpg.3120a4997e8e77b0dc31eee39843b809.jpg

DSC00141.jpg.025bf886a73f6d6547ab5909f5e69371.jpg

DSC00145.jpg.c8f6051bf5a7c2d421f269b302aa369e.jpg

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted (edited)

The narrowing of the stem at the base and colour makes it look like Collybia fussipies but that is generally found at the base of the tree. So no confirmation from me just comments.

Edited by Will Hinchliffe
spelling error
  • 3 years later...
Posted
I've just stumbled across this thread whilst searching for something else

 

Craig,

You should be glad you did, because otherwise you wouldn't have been told, that fungi with whitish gills and white spores growing at this height on oak are Mycena's, in this case M. galericulata.

Posted
Craig,

You should be glad you did, because otherwise you wouldn't have been told, that fungi with whitish gills and white spores growing at this height on oak are Mycena's, in this case M. galericulata.

 

Thanks Gerrit :thumbup1:

 

Would I be right to think that due to the lack of info in my reference material (which has been updated since we last spoke!) with regards to M. galericulata it has little arboricultural significance?

 

Incidentally, I have to climb the same tree in the next week or 2 to check how she is doing.

Posted
Thanks Gerrit :thumbup1:

 

Would I be right to think that due to the lack of info in my reference material (which has been updated since we last spoke!) with regards to M. galericulata it has little arboricultural significance?

 

Incidentally, I have to climb the same tree in the next week or 2 to check how she is doing.

 

As you aimed the Q at Gerrit I shall leave him to give you the Arb significance of the specimen.

 

However, if you have the time, it would be interesting to see the wound/cavity now.

Could you take a couple of shots ? :001_smile:

 

 

 

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.