Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

What qualifies as a veteran tree.


Gollum
 Share

Recommended Posts

Now this is what I'm talking about.

 

001-1.jpg

 

 

So with a lightning strike that can be clear.

 

With dead wood would 30% be a veteran

 

The quality and quantity of CWD (course woody debris) is a complex thing to quantify and have in a ticky box category.

 

I believe that two or more 6 inch diameter limbs would be considered enough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My understanding is that a tree which is older than its expected life is a veteran tree whilst an ancient tree is just that . . ancient. A birch tree over 100 years old would be classed as a veteran birch but for a tree to be classed as ancient it would need to be several hundred years old (probably more than 500 and more likely to be over 700 years old) in which case a birch tree could never reach ancient status.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is that a tree which is older than its expected life is a veteran tree whilst an ancient tree is just that . . ancient. A birch tree over 100 years old would be classed as a veteran birch but for a tree to be classed as ancient it would need to be several hundred years old (probably more than 500 and more likely to be over 700 years old) in which case a birch tree could never reach ancient status.

 

No, and thanks for illustrating well the confusion between ancient and veteran!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always thought that veterans should display a number of different characteristics - not just age and dead wood. For example:

- cavities

- water pockets

- flaking bark

- woodpecker holes

- large dead wood

- fungal fruits

- scars/lightening strikes

-and more...

 

I seem to remember reading that a vet should have a minimum of 'x' number of characteristics. I guess it's a bit of a tick box way of classing a veteran but it gives the weight to characteristics rather than just age or deadwood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always thought that veterans should display a number of different characteristics - not just age and dead wood. For example:

- cavities

- water pockets

- flaking bark

- woodpecker holes

- large dead wood

- fungal fruits

- scars/lightening strikes

-and more...

 

I seem to remember reading that a vet should have a minimum of 'x' number of characteristics. I guess it's a bit of a tick box way of classing a veteran but it gives the weight to characteristics rather than just age or deadwood.

 

yes but the presence of two or more veteran features is all that is needed to qualify. so two or more features and we have an EARLY veteran, then all the shades till we reach the ancients which ALL have more vet features than you can shake a stick at:thumbup1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally the term veteran is specific to the age of a tree i.e. older than the normal life span of that tree. So for example, a verteran birch would be over 100 years old whilst a veteran oak might be over 400 years old and a verteran yew may be over 600 years old. Trees of this age will usually have some or all of the characteristics previously mentioned, eg cavities, decay, fungi, dead wood etc. These cavities do not make the tree a veteran rather it is that the veteran tree being so old has these characteristics.

 

I do not think you can make a veteran tree by veteranising it, in other words artificially giving the tree the characteristics of a veteran tree. Thats like saying you can make me old by sticking a big nose on my face, pulling out a few teeth and telling me to wet my pants. :001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normally the term veteran is specific to the age of a tree i.e. older than the normal life span of that tree. So for example, a verteran birch would be over 100 years old whilst a veteran oak might be over 400 years old and a verteran yew may be over 600 years old. Trees of this age will usually have some or all of the characteristics previously mentioned, eg cavities, decay, fungi, dead wood etc. These cavities do not make the tree a veteran rather it is that the veteran tree being so old has these characteristics.

 

I do not think you can make a veteran tree by veteranising it, in other words artificially giving the tree the characteristics of a veteran tree. Thats like saying you can make me old by sticking a big nose on my face, pulling out a few teeth and telling me to wet my pants. :001_smile:

 

you need to read a bit dude!:001_tt2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.