Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
veteran

 

this is an ancient hornbeam:001_cool:

[ATTACH]75028[/ATTACH]

 

 

Now the hedge row that the hornbeam is part of has been classified as ancient.

400 to 500 years

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Now the hedge row that the hornbeam is part of has been classified as ancient.

400 to 500 years

 

see now your getting jiggy with it.:001_tt2:

 

that tree will have been hedged/pollarded many many times over the centuries, and will not have adapted to stress via secondary thickening or root flares according to the axiom.

 

I DID say that stunted trees are different, as this one is. That birch has grown well, is vital, and over a hundred years old (no doubt)

 

what is clear is that we all have different views as to what makes a veteran.

 

so what do you want to do about this? anyone?

 

59765e2ecd6c2_laetiww299710040.jpg.a581084a91e9c882879b45beb43236fe.jpg

Posted
see now your getting jiggy with it.:001_tt2:

 

that tree will have been hedged/pollarded many many times over the centuries, and will not have adapted to stress via secondary thickening or root flares according to the axiom.

 

I DID say that stunted trees are different, as this one is. That birch has grown well, is vital, and over a hundred years old (no doubt)

 

what is clear is that we all have different views as to what makes a veteran.

 

so what do you want to do about this? anyone?

 

[ATTACH]75033[/ATTACH]

 

Looks to me like part of an ancient woodland / woodbank that has been cut many times over but missed out on the regular coppicing cycles as it forms part of the old boundary...........I am making a lot of assumptions from one picture but based on that and what I know I would go ancient. Feel free to shoot me down now! :thumbup1:

Posted
Looks to me like part of an ancient woodland / woodbank that has been cut many times over but missed out on the regular coppicing cycles as it forms part of the old boundary...........I am making a lot of assumptions from one picture but based on that and what I know I would go ancient. Feel free to shoot me down now! :thumbup1:

 

I wont shoot you down! like it says in the advice notes, it isnt really something we can be prescice about, hence the variations in views reflecting this very issue.

 

it is not possible or desirable to put such a dynamic thing into convinient boxes.

 

the SKILL is in evaluating what is important to YOUR objectives, and knowing when something is deserving of extra special attention because it is biologicaly and eco systematicaly priceless.

 

eco system services are such a mis understood and undervalued issue, and trees are keystone species.

Posted

eco system services=

 

lets think about that defective limb with the cavity, there maybe no bats in it now, but its a good potential roost site, maybe not good enough for a maternity roost, but buts are migrants, nomads. they need stop gaps they will hunt in one area then once that zone has been hunted out they move on, it doesnt pay to stay too long, the more you hunt in one area the less food remains. bats need to manage resources very well indeed, they can ill afford to carry excess wieght or fly without good cause.

 

so we remove that cavity, and the bats cant overnight and catch all those oak moths, the oak moth population booms and the oaks are massivley defoliated, they gradualy get stressed and pathogens move in, and the system collapses.

 

that bat was doing us and the trees a great service for free, lets at least spare a thought to his needs.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I agree with Tony but it is really important that more people realise just how varied the survival strategies of trees can be, it is just another aspect of ecology that is fascinating and personally I find it intriguing.

Posted

Hi Dave, Veteran is a term that really has no definative age class...it can be useful to think of veteran trees as those trees that have been 'through the wars'....that is they have a physical record of past damage to their above ground structures...if you have the time and inclination try reading some of the articles in the links earlier in this thread from Treework Environmental Practice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.