Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

The arborist's little helper


Fungus
 Share

Recommended Posts

On the first picture, it's interesting to note that the WP has opted to peck the top of both scars.

 

I am sure I heard years back that a WP creates two holes as a way of confusing predators as to which nest they are in? Something like anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry to derail this thread slightly but i just heard this joke and i think it fits nicely in this thread:001_rolleyes:

 

Two tall trees, a birch and a beech, are growing in the woods. A small tree begins to grow between them, and the beech says to the birch, "Is that a son of a beech or a son of a birch?"

 

The birch says he cannot tell. Just then a woodpecker lands on the sapling. The birch says, "Woodpecker, you are a tree expert. Can you tell if that is a son of a beech or a son of a birch?"

 

The woodpecker takes a taste of the small tree. He replies, "It is neither a son of a beech nor a son of a birch. It is, however, the best piece of ash I have ever put my pecker in."

 

:lol::lol:

 

:thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the first picture, it's interesting to note that the WP has opted to peck the top of both scars ... a WP creates two holes as a way of confusing predators as to which nest they are in?

 

In my experience, woodpeckers only make one hole in a nesting tree. The reason for pecking/testing the top is, that the brown or white rot mainly is found underneath the top of the scar and/or a FB sticking out, so the effort to hollow the tree needs less hard labour, i.e. with brown rot the bird just has to "jump up and down" a few times to create a deep enough nesting cavity :001_rolleyes: . Besides, this way the bird keeps a roof close over its head.

Edited by Fungus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience, woodpeckers only make one hole in a nesting tree. The reason for pecking/testing the top is, that the brown or white rot mainly is found underneath the top of the scar and/or a FB sticking out, so the effort to hollow the tree needs less hard labour, i.e. with brown rot the bird just has to "jump up and down" a few times to create a deep enough nesting cavity :001_rolleyes: . Besides, this way the bird keeps a roof close over its head.

 

im thinking maybe its different with hispidus as it prefers the high carbon atmosphere, hence producing mycelial plugs in shwarze research?

 

so not liking the highly aerated scenario around a woodpeckers nest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe its different with hispidus as it prefers the high carbon atmosphere, hence producing mycelial plugs?

 

Tony,

Correct, as I was only referring to the brown and white rot producing species of annual or perennial bracket fungi in/on birch and red oak from my research top preference list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another example of how our little helper can guide us to problem trees.

Before a woodpecker made a nesting hole in this Quercus robur, I had noticed the double buckling at greater height without knowing whether it was caused by a reaction to a "mechanical" problem (fibre kinking : bulge-wood) or to an internal stability problem (flexibility-stiffness or slenderness ratio) caused by a white or brown rotter.

With only Phellinus robustus (see the next photo's) and no Laetiporus sulphureus around at the entire estate monitored for some years and no horizontal cracks in the buckling zones, I consider it acceptable to assume, that it has to be the white rot causing P. robustus, which is doing the damage to the heart wood of the oak without showing itself at the outside (yet).

---

Eik-Phellinus-robustus.jpg.3883d148ad4f283cd2135096768acd34.jpg

Eik-Phellinus-robustus-over.jpg.067447832b768f138346c2b3724c5087.jpg

Eik-specht-overzicht.jpg.b4c489d129cfbabdb3b058e481421a2e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is the above fruit body canker a typical? as with hispidus

 

No, it isn't a canker nor bark necrosis, but the effect of the mycelium "consuming" almost all of the heart wood after which the bark sinking starts and strips of bark are thrown off. This type of "damaging" a tree on the long run is typical of some Phellinus species, as is shown in the next two photo's of P. robustus on Quercus rubra and P. igniarius on Populus alba.

---

Phellinus-P.-alba.jpg.81baebf79c985572d254e9e75d84cbc6.jpg

Phellinus-robustus-Q.-rubra.jpg.1d91a1be1ea5c6baeaee2d5dca457d37.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.