Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Would you remove this willow?


Carlo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Would you recommend removing this willow? It is about 18 metres high and 12 metres from the house.The residents are concerned it may collapse into the garden or onto the house. In the pictures you can see a bark wound at the base of the stem with the timber decayed to about 100mm deep. On the other side there are about 30 growths from the base up to 3 metres high. I gave one a kick and it came off quite easy leaving a cone shape recess 50mm deep.

 

 

willow8.jpg

willow2.jpg

willow10.jpg

willow3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Heavy reduction will only invite large cavities at the knucle points and so a weakened crown is created and costly to maintain due to the rapid growth habit (Anual Polarding).

The close proximity to the wall is not ideal.

My advice would be to budget for the removal of the tree and replant in a more suitable place prior to a costly wall repair and in the meantime a suitable crown reduction to reduce sail and retaining a good crown appearance/shape.

It would also be advisable to look at the soil type and local services being only 12m from nearest building prior to the final descision being made. :001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The gowths shown in the pics are dormant buds or burs.

A bur results from a tree undergoing some form of stress. It may be caused by an injury, virus or fungus. Most burs grow beneath the ground, attached to the roots as a type of malignancy that is generally not discovered until the tree dies or falls over.

Such burs sometimes appear as groups of bulbous protrusions connected by a system of rope-like roots. Almost all bur wood is covered by bark, even if it is underground. Insect infestation and certain types of mold infestation are the most common causes of this condition.:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its already a pollarded tree, re pollarding is the retention option, reduction might not be sufficient to stop torsional moments placing shear stresses on that decayed trunk or old pollard points.

 

Personaly i would fell it for the same reasons tony gave, but its not my tree, and generaly I assume if somone is asking "would I fell something" they are really looking for reasons to retain, because they can see the reasons to fell. Its easy to make a fell call, much harder to justify retention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see both points of view. My initial opinion is that it is too close to the wall and so will only cause problems in the long run so be cost effective to fell now rather than pollard then fell at a later date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.