Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi Tony and Gerrit,

 

I too have a picture similar to that. The Beech in the foreground was felled (due to proximity to housing, road and security hut) due to the signs of the Meripilus. The tree in the background had no previous visible signs of FFBs until the front one was felled. Is this a panic reaction or am I looking too deep and this is natural progression for the fungi? :confused1::confused1:

 

:thumbup1:

 

Yes, this is an example of panic fruiting of the mycelium of Meripilus giganteus from a beech stump, that still has living tissues to support the decomposition of dead wood to produce FB's from by the mycelium, that has infected the tree in the background too through root-root contact and also fruits from this tree, because the mycelium "as a whole" is triggered to (panic) fruit simultaneously.

 

 

What would the implications of this be for the background tree?

Would the panic fruiting quickly try and use up as much of the trees reserves as it could find or would it settle down again after "realising" the background tree was still there/fine?

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
What would the implications of this be for the background tree? Would the panic fruiting quickly try and use up as much of the trees reserves as it could find or would it settle down again after "realising" the background tree was still there/fine?

 

I expect your last suggestion to happen, but nothing as unpredictable as the future fruiting of an annual macrofungus :confused1: .

Posted

Yesterday I found this example of final (partially) sterile panic fruiting of Meripilus giganteus from a living root of a last year felled beech, of which the stump had completely been grinded with only wood chips remaining from which Coprinus lagopus fruited to the right.

---

59765e60defa7_Meripilusgiganteusnoodbloeisteriel.jpg.d3dbff46f25a2fe6b88d6fd99d6eaf04.jpg

  • 3 months later...
Posted (edited)

59765f6d87d21_HFungus.jpg.4e0f8a8aeb2ea1e025c87834cf217ac9.jpg

Hfungus2.jpg.8d37303f69312cb81287c5ab9c96d780.jpg

 

Would this be panic fruiting by Armillaria? What is the mess up the stem? its not actual a HF fruiting body as such.

 

Also in the previous picture how can you tell if the fungi is sterile?

Edited by ADB328
Posted
1. Would this be panic fruiting by Armillaria? What is the mess up the stem? its not actual a HF fruiting body as such.

2. Also in the previous picture how can you tell if the fungi is sterile?

 

1. Could be if the tree recently died. And the mess on the stem is resin produced by coniferous trees as a reaction to the presence (high up) in the stem of mycelium or rhizomorphs of the necrotrophic parasitic Armillaria, that killed the tree.

2. Because of the absence of tubes and spores.

Posted

Thanks for getting back to me. The mess up the stem was almost like mycelium sheets externally rather than between the wood, im sure you understand what i mean.

 

It was really weird have never seen anything like it.

Posted
[ATTACH]84363[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH]84364[/ATTACH]

 

Would this be panic fruiting by Armillaria? What is the mess up the stem? its not actual a HF fruiting body as such.

 

Also in the previous picture how can you tell if the fungi is sterile?

 

I suspect lime (tillia) and as you elude panic reproduction of armillaria at late stage degradation, which is evident by the presence of what is most likely coniophora probably puteana, a common scenario on broad-leaf trees in the U.K.

 

I have only recently begun to connect and recognise this coniophora to trees I find, one that really requires microscopic clarification but ive seen enough of it now to realise what this one really is and it appears to thrive on the well rotted damp cambium/bark issues that arise from late stage armillaria attack.

Posted
The mess up the stem was almost like mycelium sheets externally rather than between the wood, im sure you understand what i mean.

 

No, I don't, a close up would be welcome and is the tree not a coniferous species then ?

Posted
No, I don't, a close up would be welcome and is the tree not a coniferous species then ?

 

Unfortunatly i didnt take any closer up photos than that which was silly. Nope not Conifer it was a monolith'd lime tree.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.