Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Keizer's Fungi Q & A.


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Red Data List & rareity status of some of the species in your encyclopaedia, does that relate specifically to Holland or further afield ?

 

David,

Yes, it does relate specifically to The Netherlands - Holland only is the western part of my country of birth - because the translaters of the original version of my encyclopaedia were not familiar with the situation in your country, so they confined themselves to simply repeating the data from the Dutch first edition from 1996 in the English first edition of 1997. As you may have noticed, they also sometimes left out the number of species present in your country when a genus is introduced and replaced the number of species with an X. And on my CD-ROM, only the Dutch reviewed edition from 2010 has been updated for the Dutch Red List of 2007.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 498
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

David,

Yes, it does relate specifically to The Netherlands - Holland only is the western part of my country of birth - because the translaters of the original version of my encyclopaedia were not familiar with the situation in your country, so they confined themselves to simply repeating the data from the Dutch first edition from 1996 in the English first edition of 1997. As you may have noticed, they also sometimes left out the number of species present in your country when a genus is introduced and replaced the number of species with an X. And on my CD-ROM, only the Dutch reviewed edition from 2010 has been updated for the Dutch Red List of 2007.

 

 

 

Thanks Gerrit, I had suspected but was keen to hear it confirmed.

 

Would be interesting to compare status of a specific species in both countries (something like Podocypher perhaps) & then look at the habitat situation & occurance in each country.

 

In terms of Myco conservation, I wonder if this type of work is currently happening & being collated at a continental level ?

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David as I know you are aware, myco conservation does have a very strong UK voice...

 

A babe is born! International Society of Fungal Conservation - Scottish Fungi

 

http://www.imafungus.org/Issue/2/09.pdf

 

 

 

Great links sean, thank you.

 

Aware of the growing collabourations, but would be inspiring to hear if the conected field work is occuring now.

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Would be interesting to compare status of a specific species in both countries & then look at the habitat situation & occurance in each country.

2. In terms of Myco conservation, I wonder if this type of work is currently happening & being collated at a continental level ?

 

David,

1. Yes it would, starting here and now with our cooperation on the effects of wood decay strategies of macrofungi on the condition and stability of trees.

2. It is happening at an European level (European Mycological Association) and has resulted in a project on drawing up an European Red List for Macrofungi : http://www.plantaeuropa.org/assets/EIP%20files/T2%20-%20EU%20red%20list%20for%20Macro%20fungi.pdf.

Edited by Fungus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

some oddities that I have no ideas as to an identification, I suspected coniophora arida on the last image, and possibly a serpula for the whit crust?

is the little orange one a pluteus sp?

 

Tony,

Could you, if relevant, in future include as much information as possible, such as tree species of the substrate, pores, spore colour, etc. ?

1. Young Armillaria spp. and in the background black crusts of a Spaeriales, i.e. Ustulina deusta ?

2. Phlebia radiata.

3. Not a Serpula, but because the photo does not show whether the fungus has a smooth hymenium (f.i. Cerocorticium confluens) or a hymenium with pores (f.i. Physisporinus spp.) and whether it has a distinct smell (lysol), I can't give a name to it. Besides, for most of this type of Aphyllophorales a microscope is needed to identify the species.

4. With pink spores : Pluteus (cf. leoninus), with ochrous brown spores : Galerina spp.

5. On wood of oak : Mycena inclinata, on oak, but mostly on other wood : Mycena arcangeliana.

6. Correct :thumbup1: : Coniophora cf. arida and the white one in the background : microscope.

Edited by Fungus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony,

Could you, if relevant, in future include as much information as possible, such as tree species of the substrate, pores, spore colour, etc. ?

1. Young Armillaria spp. and in the background black crusts of a Spaeriales, i.e. Ustulina deusta ?

2. Phlebia radiata.

3. Not a Serpula, but because the photo does not show whether the fungus has a smooth hymenium (f.i. Cerocorticium confluens) or a hymenium with pores (f.i. Physisporinus spp.) and whether it has a distinct smell (lysol), I can't give a name to it. Besides, for most of this type of Aphyllophorales a microscope is needed to identify the species.

4. With pink spores : Pluteus (cf. leoninus), with ochrous brown spores : Galerina spp.

5. On wood of oak : Mycena inclinata, on other wood : Mycena arcangeliana.

6. Correct :thumbup1: : Coniophora cf. arida and the white one in the background : microscope.

 

I should have included more info yes apologies.

 

1 cannot be an armillaria, it as can be seen in image contains a flesh that like xylarias is white and brittle like carrot, if my memory is correct it was on beech, and at first i thought they was some form of puff balls like lycoperdons, but the flesh as i said was identical in form and texture to a formed xylaria polymorpha, very white and very brittle

 

at least i got the coniophora, thanks to your book!:thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 cannot be an armillaria, it as can be seen in image contains a flesh that like xylarias is white and brittle like carrot, if my memory is correct it was on beech, and at first i thought they was some form of puff balls like lycoperdons, but the flesh as i said was identical in form and texture to a formed xylaria polymorpha, very white and very brittle

 

Tony,

Conclusion : your first hunch was correct :thumbup1: : it is Lycoperdon pyriforme, so the score now is two out of six.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.