Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Boxing Day Hunt Meets


Matthew Arnold
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My dad and i go lamping atleast twice a week on various estates in and around the county. We regularly have 2 or 3 a night. Even with the hunts using a quadbike with a foxblood filled sock or similar it is inevitable for charlie to get caught by the hounds. Its what they have been bred to do. The videos anti hunting and anti shooting groups put up on Youtube and on their own websites show the "bad" side of the hunts and shoots. I've videod shoot days on a commercial shoot where the guns shoot 300 + birds. All of birds go into th human food chain. Nothing goes to waste (we even reuse the ties!!). Granted some birds are "pillowed" but they are very few and far between. I have attached images of a commercial shoot i go to in Dorset. I shot there today infact. The first pic is of me on a drive known as Eight Acre bank. The second pic is of the game cart after the first two drives. The last picture is a group photo of all of the beaters and pickers up from the 2008-2009 season.

IMG_3007.jpg.a5399c6f7ada1f53323b730cb15d581e.jpg

IMG_2767.jpg.13de45898f603dafba2b5423c878b48c.jpg

IMG_2758.jpg.506d3ec1f82058e1bb7e99b42aaffb5c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox blood filled sock...... Utter rubbish! the rag, duster or what ever they are draging around is for show ONLY and a back up story in case the preverbial hits the fan, I should know I did it! Every hunt in England is hunting foxes just the same as they were before the ban accept with some one carting around a bird of prey which is another loophole just incase.

Foxe scent is different from fox blood, urine or a dead fox being dragged around and when we tried it the hounds wernt the least bit intrested in it.

We killed on the first day of the ban and I know most other packs did aswell, if there big enougth to hunt the should admit it insted of hiding behind lies!

 

It annoys me when people they say there hunting a scent when there not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox blood filled sock...... Utter rubbish! the rag, duster or what ever they are draging around is for show ONLY and a back up story in case the preverbial hits the fan, I should know I did it!

 

So everyone else does exactly what you do eh? :sneaky2:

 

 

You just seem to have a massive chip on your shoulder bud.

 

 

Sam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Na no chip on my shoulder mate, Im just sick and tired of all the hunts saying that they are hunting a scent when its a pack of lies, there is not one hunt in this country that hunts a scent other than a real foxs other than if the antis turn up filming and any body that is involved with hunting knows that I am telling the truth but is obvioully not going to admit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Na no chip on my shoulder mate, Im just sick and tired of all the hunts saying that they are hunting a scent when its a pack of lies, there is not one hunt in this country that hunts a scent other than a real foxs other than if the antis turn up filming and any body that is involved with hunting knows that I am telling the truth but is obvioully not going to admit it.

 

If they are all carrying on as they did before, dos'nt it say something about the stupidty of this so called ban.

I can take as many dogs as I want to hunt a rabbit, but only two to hunt a fox, hare or deer, to flush towards guns.

I can take a bird of prey to kill a fox, hare, but not a dog.

How can I shoot a fox, leave it wounded and dying of gangrene and not break the law.

 

The hunting ban had nothing to do with animal welfare, it was all about Labour hitting back at the "toffs" as revenge for the miners strike, "Two jags" admitted that. How many hours of parliamentary time did it take up, how many thousands of pounds were spent ramming through a bill on something that the vast majority of people never gave a thought too.

Oh yes, and was'nt it about that time that Tony Blair took us into a war that has cost this country millions of pounds, hundreds of lives and a lasting legacy of a terrorist threat, it's a shame they did'nt put more thought into running the country instead of banning hunting!

And has the ban done anything for foxes, nope, there are far more killed today than pre-ban.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compleatly right cousain jack,

 

I cant remember the exact figures but there was hundreds more hours spent debating the ban compaired to going to war with Iraq and there were a few mp that retired once the ban had gone through saying that they have done there job.

Compleate wast of money!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.