Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Autosplit ailments


Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

 

I wondered if any of you had experience of the Posch Autosplit machines?

 

I have recently got hold of an Autosplit 350, mainly to produce firewood. It states in the literature that it can produce a final product with a cross section width ranging from 1cm to 18cm (small kindling to chunky firewood). The size is dictated by the amount the hydralic log ring conveyor advances each splitting cycle.

 

My problem is that I can only get the conveyor to advance a maximum of 11cm each cycle. This produces rather small cross section firewood logs.

 

I've tried a larger capacity flow regulator on the hydraulic conveyor belt to give it more oomph but it made no difference. Starting to think that the oil pump is already working at it's capacity. If so, the machine cannot perform to it's stated spec.

 

Has anyone got any bright ideas/ experience of this issue with the Autosplits?

 

Many thanks, TVI 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

The log ring size is certainly relevant but it is the conveyor advance that is the main determining factor.

 

There are some terrible videos on the internet but it actually produces a really good product with half decent feed stock. No more trash than a conventional processor and much more uniform.

 

I just need the conveyor to advance a few more cms and the world will be a wonderful place once more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you've tried a bigger flow on the input, there must be a restriction somewhere on the pipe return.

 

Only other option to keep everything else stock would be to fit a smaller displacement conveyor drive motor, smaller displacement would increase the rotational speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GarethM said:

If you've tried a bigger flow on the input, there must be a restriction somewhere on the pipe return.

 

Only other option to keep everything else stock would be to fit a smaller displacement conveyor drive motor, smaller displacement would increase the rotational speed.

 

That's interesting. I hadn't thought of changing the drive motor. I'll ask Jas P Wilson's if this is an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.