Dead-wooding protected trees - Are we all doing it wrong?

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

6 hours ago, Gary Prentice said:

Congrats.... Thread derailed in the first response 

 

This is the legal forum, so the pro's and cons of deadwood are totally irrelevant Khriss , try to keep on track (see what I did there?)

 

Cornwall councils interpretation of the requirement to submit a five day notice, where the risk of harm/damage is low, is a new one on me and has never been raised in any of the training that I've attended. 

To be fair, it even seems logical and on a par with the rules relating to dead trees i.e. notify unless there is an imminent risk of harm/damage.

I’m actually in shock Gary!

 

Cornwall council being held out as paradigm....

 

I think I’m actually having a panic attack!

[Khriss]

51 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

I’m actually in shock Gary!

 

Cornwall council being held out as paradigm....

 

I think I’m actually having a panic attack!

I'm in shock cos you spelt 'paradigm' right!      ( sorry @GaryPrentise puppet show later free of charge!) k

[Khriss]

13 hours ago, Paul Cleaver said:

.......and the TO makes an unnecessary  mad dash to the site.

I would pay serious money to see that ever happening ! A mad dash to even answer an email would satisfy ? k

[Khriss]

10 hours ago, EdwardC said:

If it's not clear, or easy to understand, from the document what the Council are trying to communicate, it's a failure of the Council.

 

Elsewhere on here I have extolled the values of grammer, punctuation and spelling to make it clear exactly what it is that you are trying to communicate.

Yr precisely right Edward, dunno how many times I have corrected people to "its to 'whom' am I speaking" not " wot you lookin at.." k