WirralBoy

Flawless - that's the way to do it, ThatsTheWay.mp4

Both the Oxford and Cambridge dictionaries list both spellings. Either is acceptable English. The Cambridge dictionary does expand, as follows :- recognizable adjective (UK - usually recognisable)

Devon & Cornwall Police have this to say; snipped from their website :- [quote] It is not illegal to take photographs or video footage in public places unless it is for criminal or terrorist purposes. Members of the public and the media do not need a permit to film or photograph in public places and police have no power to stop them filming or photographing incidents or police personnel. There is no law preventing people from taking photographs in public. This includes taking photos of other people's children. However if you take photos of other people's children and it is reported to us we may treat this as suspicious behaviour and depending on the circumstances would create an incident log. If you are taking photographs from private land, you need to have the land owner's permission. Taking of a photo of a person where they can expect privacy (inside their home or garden) is likely to cause a breach of privacy laws. It would be appropriate and would avoid unnecessary complications if you ask the person for permission. The taking of photographs of an individual without their consent is a civil matter. [unquote] Publishing a photo of someone is something else. It generally depends on who owns the copyright of the photo. That will usually be the person who took it. Using Images with Identifiable People The rules about using images with recognizable people come down to two considerations: Did the person in the photo have a reasonable expectation of privacy? How is the image being used?

Crackin(1).mp4 Crackin(1).mp4

When you need peace and quiet PeaceQuiet.mp4

No participants were hurt in the making of this comedy double act video. Whoops22.mp4

Itchy bum ? Itchy Bum.mp4

Cotton-Eye Joe CottonEyeJoe.mp4

Where did he come from, where did he go ? Where'dHeGo.mp4

COWARD! Coward.mp4

Proper planning prevents . . . . . . . . . . . . . ThinkThrough.mp4

U.S.A. pressure group demands "right to know" Whereisit.mp4

I'm economising . . . . . . . £3.70

Sacked Children's Party Entertainer

Good night out ?

Hmmmm! MonkeyGame.mp4

Taking one for the team. One For The Team.mp4

Sorry lads. Screwed up.

ActNormal.mp4

A proper Arbdog ArbDog.mp4

Somebody should call the Fire Brigade Oh . . . . . . . wait . . . . . . . FireFire.mp4

Sorry. I was obviously having a brain fart. [quote] do the police and cameras use the same information to check [/quote] Probably. But I'm sure that they wait for "up to 5 working days" before taking any action regarding suspected VED abnormalities. You may wish to visit the Pepipoo forums where there are many more knowledgeable members regarding motoring matters and the law. FightBack Forums FORUMS.PEPIPOO.COM

It can take "up to five working days for the records to update" according to the GOV.UK website.