BillQ

....and Trump?

There's one like that buried in the sand on little haven beach, in stormy weather it gets partially uncovered and you sometimes see a group of people trying to hack their way into it and remove it to prevent plastic pollution. Does that mean it's worth more or less?

If I were to jump to conclusions, I wonder what I would make of the recent tranche of emails from Epstein and Maxwell about the dog that hasn't barked? Apparently Trump spent many hours with Giuffre, who was once employed by trump in his club. Maxwell, who is doing a 20 year stretch got moved from florida jail to a minimum security facility in Texas and is "reportedly" getting concierge services! She is trying to get her sentence commuted and DJT hasn't ruled out a pardon! All of this after she said she said; l"I don’t recall ever seeing [Trump] in [Epstein’s] house for instance,” Of course DJT is totally squeaky clean and didn't pay off SD the porn star, and certainly there is no credence in the email about him "...leaving his nose print on the glass as young women were swimming in the pool and he was so focused he walked straight into the door.", nor how GE “gave” Trump his ex-girlfriend: Norwegian businesswoman Celina Midelfart, or about Lauren Petrella; who reportedly accused Trump of making unwanted sexual advances at her. I'm sure that there is nothing untoward going on and only those who would jump to conclusions would see something seedy here.

Probably the most prolific sex offender in the UK... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdegpepg6n7o

"Over and over, and over and over and over, like a monkey with a miniature cymbal!"

Thicko, read the red underlined bits, undisclosed, suggest.......

No charges, it was a civil law suit you thicko, now lets check the wording and why it was worded that way. Not one bit of evidence there. You never asked, you made an assumption. Now back up your words with actions, get those letters written or are you a coward?

What is wrong with you? You've been given an answer, I'm not on his side and I'm not condemning him as there are not enough facts nor has he been charged with anything. If things change then so will my position on him, that's how justice works. If you are so sure he's a paedophile then back yourself by writing to him informing him that you know he's a paedophile and send copies to several broadsheets as well. However you won't because your a gutless keyboard warrior who thinks he can spout off about everything with impunity, call their bluff and it won't happen.

No, still thick.

Happy to hear that the Philippines did get as much damage and deaths from a super typhoon as thought. They seem to cop it regularly from regular typhoons so perhaps they are getting better at preparing for them???

See, you can learn! That was an insult, let's try again with a 3rd attempt at guilt and innocence in law? If someone is accused of something say, being a paedophile, then we have to wait until the justice system determines whether they are or not. If you don't think that is correct I suggest you get your big boy pants on and write a letter, with your name and address on it and tell Mr Andrew Mountbatten Windsor he's a paedophile and then see what happens! Me, I'll wait before jumping in with both feet, keep us updated on how it turns out.

So very thick!

I have been trying but it doesn't seem to be working.

To the general population here rather than going round ragging the same issues. Seems you are still dumb, you got an answer and still jump to conclusions. You can't even use the proverb correctly. Let's try again, has he been found guilty of anything? (The answer is no, just helping you out) Bit harder this one, if he hasn't been found guilty of sex with a minor then then you shouldn't call him names, leave that until he is found guilty. If you don't understand that then we'll go no further and you can do some colouring in, but no eating the crayons again

Nothing about the Lady Mayor's parade?. Remembrance Sunday? Samir Zitouni regaining consciousness?