Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Found this growing either side of a historic wound near the base of a Cedar, cant decide if it's the adaptive growth or a fungus, red and greasy nearest the deadwood, concentric growth rings becoming woody towards the outer edges. Any ideas?

T1d.jpg.2a04a10810ea4a45ec9310ae56907798.jpg

T1b.jpg.0f902d1f9b0fc1be925492402e72ceaa.jpg

T1a.jpg.ba07da2e3c567d262987e96d208e31b5.jpg

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted (edited)
got to be adaptive growth - a bracket fungus would grow horizontally

 

I wuldn't say adaptive growth, it looks more simply like a response to wounding or some other reason for a large area of exposed wood. Even if there's not much or any visible decay this looks like classic Shigo CODIT Wall 4, inching towards occlusion and benefitting meantime from the legendary resistance of Cedar to superficial aerial decay. I'd admit readily that adaptive growth and wound occlusion are close relatives, the rapid growth response is reputedly due to flexure in both scenarios. But in this case it looks like normal flexure rahter than adaptation to changng forces on the tree.

 

Bitut there's only so much you can tell form a couple of pictures. I ma delighted that no-one (so far!) on Arbtalk has said "It's knackerd, great firewood by the way, looks like there's something in the background that might be crushed by the tree's imminent failure, fell it!"

Edited by daltontrees
Posted
I wuldn't say adaptive growth, it looks more simply like a response to wounding or some other reason for a large area of exposed wood. Even if there's not much or any visible decay this looks like classic Shigo CODIT Wall 4, inching towards occlusion and benefitting meantime from the legendary resistance of Cedar to superficial aerial decay. I'd admit readily that adaptive growth and wound occlusion are close relatives, the rapid growth response is reputedly due to flexure in both scenarios. But in this case it looks like normal flexure rahter than adaptation to changng forces on the tree.

 

Bitut there's only so much you can tell form a couple of pictures. I ma delighted that no-one (so far!) on Arbtalk has said "It's knackerd, great firewood by the way, looks like there's something in the background that might be crushed by the tree's imminent failure, fell it!"

 

:thumbup1:

Posted

Thanks guys - always good to get a second opinion. The tree is TPO'd and staying put, this has just been unearthed after the homeowner cleared a load of ivy and vegetation from the area and was understandably a little concerned. Given that the tree is around 70ft tall and located less than 20 from his house.

 

Ooh, on second thoughts, better fell it then - for safety's sake!!!:001_rolleyes::001_rolleyes::001_rolleyes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.