Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Rather poorly Oak


kevinjohnsonmbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

David, thank you! Sorry, couldn't see tops on that occasion, I was out on a social visit so didn't have ladders, bino's, parrot drone etc. I couldn't ID it in my ref books (AA Fungi on trees, Webber/Matheck Manual of Wood Decays in Trees, Strouts/Winter No.2 Diagnosis of I'll Health in Trees) and was feeling rather beaten! How do we best assess the impact/effect the specimen might have upon the host tree in a case like this - type of rot, likely extent / outcome for host tree etc? Appreciate your thoughts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a particularly common find and seldom listed in the main arb resources.

 

Top of my head, I don't think we have it in the Arbtalk Fungi App.

 

 

They look to be located on the wounds of what may have been an old lightning strike (?)

 

I believe they're a saprobic species, degrading/consuming the dysfunctional wood.

 

 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a particularly common find and seldom listed in the main arb resources.

 

Top of my head, I don't think we have it in the Arbtalk Fungi App.

 

 

They look to be located on the wounds of what may have been an old lightning strike (?)

 

I believe they're a saprobic species, degrading/consuming the dysfunctional wood.

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

I make that correct on all counts Mr humphries, first sighting for me on Oak in any lit too, so thanks to the OP for the share:thumbup1:

 

One of the most stunning of shrooms, with the most awesome roll off the tongue name, and one of my all time faves:001_cool:

 

a seriously cool shroom, the shroom hunters shroom you might say:biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed veteran Tony, but the location is high risk and quite worrying - I took a day trip across to Camelford/St Tudy area (Cornwall) to catch up with an old school buddy who's holidaying with his family at a park there. I was amazed that lodges had been built all around the tree at little more than 5-10 (varying) meters from the stem - I don't know what the chalet footings are but they looked 10-15 years old and dread to think what allowance was (or wasn't!) made for the RPA. Canopy with extensive deadwood, major limbs and stem with significant defects and children playing all day underneath. Here is a problem waiting to happen! I'll drop a line to the park owners and offer a climbing survey but I'm not optimistic they'll accept, there are several fairly amateurish historic limb reductions which tends to indicate either an "in-house" gardener or a local cowboy has had a go previously. I think I've got some more pics other than those posted earlier, I'll have a check a post 'em up if I do. Thanks for the feedback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.