Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Woodland V Gardens/Grounds.


Gary Prentice
 Share

Recommended Posts

I spoke to the guy at the FC today. Basically he said if it looks like a garden then they'd class it as a garden, if it looks like a wood they'd class it as a wood. He also mentioned OED definition and maintenance being a large part of this, so if trees are maintained in a garden like fashion (private arboretum?) then they'd class it as a garden.

 

Not sure if this helps, it seemed a bit wooly. The links to the cases above seem more concrete than my conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

John K,

 

 

In your link there's reference again to McInerney v Portland Port Ltd, but I still can't find the court report.

 

I have MS Word versions of both this judgment and that of Michael John Rockall v Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. These are the full judgments.

 

I see that the job's been postponed but f you're still interested then PM me an email address and I'll gladly email them to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To the best of my knowledge, land use is defined by Land Registry, so you should be able to do a Land Registry search without alerting the 'normal' powers such as the council - it's the same search as when you're buying a house but you can order it yourself online.

 

There are various designations - agricultural, domestic dwelling, greenbelt etc. and so long as it shows that the area concerned lies within the curtilage it should fall within the domestic dwelling heading, although there may be covenants on this. This matters as much to your client in his ongoing plans to build something planning exempt, presuming the exemption is not an agricultural one based on total holding.

 

Note though, it's worth checking the defined curtilage - even if the area has been historically used as garden this isn't always strictly speaking legitimate. My own place for example looks like one plot, but is actually three, previous owners having bought different bits of adjoining land. One is the original domestic dwelling plot which has planning exemptions but is subject to listed building consent, a second is unencumbered agricultural and the third is agricultural with covenants. Walking round my 'garden' you could never identify which was which unless you knew, and what you do with trees/construction etc. could be perfectly legitimate in one part of the 'garden' but not in another.

 

Alec

 

I've downloaded the Land Registry Title Plan, but It only shows an outline (in red). I'm unsure if this is the plan you meant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.