Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
Neighbour up the road bought one o them (International Tractors) brand new to buckrake silage.

The hired help thought it was great crack to still be travelling forward with the wheels spinning madly in reverse, an visa-versa.

OK smooth concrete lubed with squashed grass is quite slippery, but the old girl took simply dogs abuse and never lay down.

Very sound engineering, and a therefore cracking base-unit for a forwarder.

That I recall

 

https://thefarmingforum.co.uk/index.php?threads/international-hydro-84.15291/

 

IH 85 Hydro for Sale - KG Kingston

1382_DSCF2652.JPG.89671639f5bf0a13080af45321255b7d.JPG

  • 2 weeks later...

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Ditto.

 

That 840 looks like a great machine.

 

Those logs in the first picture don't look too shabby either.

 

Do you know roughly the length lowloader needed to move it and it's weight empty?

Posted (edited)

Takes 2 bays of 3. It's a good sized machine. Probably needs more than 7.5m of lowloader from headboard to ramps, I'm guessing. I'm tempted to try the 840 instead of using our valtra roof mount, but put off by the reliability issues in general of older high hour forwarders. Also, how well they handle short distances of road as occasionally we have to haul wood back to a farmyard etc.. Cheers, John

Edited by Logan
Posted
Takes 2 bays of 3. It's a good sized machine. Probably needs more than 7.5m of lowloader from headboard to ramps, I'm guessing. I'm tempted to try the 840 instead of using our valtra roof mount, but put off by the reliability issues in general of older high hour forwarders. Also, how well they handle short distances of road as occasionally we have to haul wood back to a farmyard etc.. Cheers, John

 

Hi John

 

I think my forwarder is slightly longer than it states in the manual. But the drawing gives you an idea of overall dimensions for transport.

 

Running costs are always an issue with older machines this ones just done over 12k and mechanically fairly sound.

 

Cheers Mark

forw.jpg.6931dba48739a1f3e0b263b0131badb5.jpg

Posted (edited)
I was recently advised to stick with my 578 Bruunett and not be tempted by the more troublesome 678.

 

Have to say that makes sense. Running costs of my Bruunett have been astronomically low...

 

I'll do a cost per tonne...

 

£1.83/tonne not including labour/driver or low loader transport. Just fuel and maintenance / repairs inc Vat.

 

Said repairs fairly major cost wise shouldn't be repeated for many years inc cab glass, bogie repair, hose swivels.

Edited by TimberCutterDartmoor
Posted

Thanks for posting that schematic Mark, a little over 8.5m in length.

 

Does anyone do any highway driving with these, or is it a no no?

 

12,000 hrs sounds good, lots of life left there.

 

TCD, did you include a cost of ownership in that, or do you reckon it's stopped depreciating and has gone up in value? Interest rates are so low it's hard to assess this cost in the old way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.