Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
supposedly Laetiporus based on micro annalysis, but nothing like any Laeti I've ever come across. :confused1:

 

But as Tony & others often say, these fung don't do stereo type.

 

 

 

.

 

For both myself and monkey to be caught off by a laeti is prime example of fungis often contrary nature, and david, when Ive got the scopes youll be more than welcome to the mini lab with open accses, its getting done ASAP, nice log cabin at the bottom of the garden with full faciltiies, including a cappacino machine! lmao:thumbup1:

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

might need bunk beds and a stock of tinned foods, as I'd imagine a Ted Kaczynski like existance might ensue, once your inside "the lab"

 

 

 

Did ya ever get any further shots of the "Laeti" ?

 

 

.

Posted

Ok so here is an update one week on from the original (possible) armillaria photos, to me it now looks more like armillaria especially if I compare photos in our awesome new directory, what do you think?

resized.jpg.bf1b2514dbf8d324b8cbb170997fe8c7.jpg

 

59765795320a0_resized3.jpg.269f81ccbd764c8c46389f274aec3971.jpg

 

59765795340bd_resized2.jpg.f0916a852e2e35a48fbab45633520566.jpg

Posted
might need bunk beds and a stock of tinned foods, as I'd imagine a Ted Kaczynski like existance might ensue, once your inside "the lab"

 

 

 

Did ya ever get any further shots of the "Laeti" ?

 

 

.

 

yes i did, the pip one no, the multiple ones on the oak deadwood yes, will post em up in a while:001_cool:

Posted
Ok so here is an update one week on from the original (possible) armillaria photos, to me it now looks more like armillaria especially if I compare photos in our awesome new directory, what do you think?

[ATTACH]43752[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]43753[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]43754[/ATTACH]

 

Cap scales don't look quite right for me Ian.

But is a possible.

 

I'm away at the moment, so no books with me, will try & remember to have a further look when I'm back.

 

Unless someone else fancies chasing it down?

 

 

.

Posted
Thanks David, my books are currently in storage so i'm struggling abit as well at the mo.

 

nah, im tending toward pholiota now, just aint giving me that armillaria vibe dude, much more pholiota in these than armilaria, but i have been wrong before, and no doubt shall be wrong again, as is the nature of this most tricky subject!

 

what shape was the stipe basal attachment?

Posted

yes these will help, there is a distinct lack of viel around the stipe, "ring" armilaria tabascens has no ring, but we can rule that out cos your previous image did have a slight ring remaining, I shall ponder a while and give my view but its a close thing at the mo I feel, never will be a substitute for being on site with sample in hand and a good "feel" for the natural nieghbourhood, contextual ground.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.