Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

well, that was an interesting wee site visit.

thanks for the location Peter :thumbup1:

 

It's really good to put these things into a realistic context rather than out of a book.

 

Valuable to get a feel of a tree, its p&d & the conditions affecting it within its locality.

 

.

IMG_9127.JPG.16d2df715c482c45748ad06fb9320901.JPG

IMG_9137.JPG.2288eed2308ed1e9d115f7160596fe81.JPG

IMG_9153.jpg.e23a736bad768df20657a813d9227047.jpg

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

I had a good listen for decay on a fair selection of the trees using a sounding hammer. Came across that there was little discernable heart decay in evidence (shame I didn't have the PD400 from work with me, to drill for resistance)

 

Having read some of the study bits on this thread, (partciularly where its noted that the larvae only tunnel just under the bark) I would tend to agree, from what I saw, that the larvae are not creating a change in the wood structure/stability concerning the cross section of the trunks. (having looked at the failed tree, the tunnels abruptly stop within a couple of inches of the surface)

 

I would think that as a consequence of the holes a pathogenic fungi has gained access, and white rotted this pops woody cells, releaving it of its lignin.

 

.

IMG_9136.JPG.8646560cff06b82f6735dadfdd45aa6b.JPG

IMG_9130.JPG.ab6dd2c3cc014214b68db20ffaa8a2b2.JPG

IMG_9129.JPG.c79aff861a78e13457a38342bcca83eb.JPG

IMG_9131.JPG.6a07ab7cc4be1d1c40f5fa1718c18ab8.JPG

IMG_9128.JPG.2ab9b941a9a3025c9ddf347e339d42fb.JPG

IMG_9140.JPG.49016230ddcd69898ef14b0933b75c16.JPG

IMG_9139.jpg.079a8527add5ad82db0f8a171ca2cfc3.jpg

Posted

As for a culprit for the failure, that's fairly difficult to ascertain.

 

I had a really good look for fruiting bodies across the site, and apart from a few sapros & a decent sized puff ball

there was precious little else there.

 

.

IMG_9144.JPG.f749379af55927d7129ce5ac89ffebff.JPG

IMG_9143.JPG.3f08081192401af7c620edcbd325a6e2.JPG

IMG_9142.JPG.bf57fe12142bcc71ed7b53a272b5339d.JPG

IMG_9141.JPG.e1210bcd4617737139221ab7b8cd8793.JPG

IMG_9125.JPG.169fdd5f7788114efee6837e0149f40b.JPG

IMG_9123.jpg.3c56e135dee1e9a65b13fb8d2ab6cfcf.jpg

IMG_9122.JPG.163891c6b16d69c671073243ddd878fb.JPG

IMG_9121.JPG.c1238fbc45bf43a734ea3f45ba77f812.JPG

Posted

However, having a closer look at the failure there was a broad bean sized fruiting body that needed further examination.

 

I split it open to see no forming tube layer, but a fibrous/wooly brown flesh.

 

I would lean toward this being either a Ganoderma or perhaps a Fomes.

 

.

IMG_9135.JPG.95c98c71d0edfc3f1be2d12535fc845e.JPG

IMG_9133.JPG.1598fff8185d4b53daa51450ffeba684.JPG

IMG_9132.JPG.d78b5ed79930fb730ba18a5c0125641a.JPG

IMG_9131.JPG.b49619ff01a1a8c60d48adb3fd2b247e.JPG

Posted

A couple of other note-worthy discoveries,

 

there was a small tree failure a little way from the main tree failure that had split out at height, just above an old woodpecker hole.

 

& just a couple trees further down the line, there was also a fair size tree that is bleeding & has a heavily declining conopy.

 

 

.

IMG_9151.jpg.ae4cbf6f416b0fdca7d885e7498b17d5.jpg

IMG_9150.jpg.0753ee01db920f61e5992ca084ece3cf.jpg

IMG_9149.jpg.e38fa3f11acbf4554d68c744ce36069f.jpg

IMG_9147.jpg.b439148bf7a6a52acf3703d569bf2e13.jpg

IMG_9148.jpg.eede27ccf90ff77e8f256c5f775b4e95.jpg

IMG_9152.jpg.5a0e9ccd370c9f0c9e4f1559a61bbe26.jpg

Posted

psuedo plating, decline through dysfuntion of bark boring and the bleeds along with lack of fruiting bodies all indicate armillaria as the secondary pathogen, with the gano I suspect having been over run by the mellea.

 

nice documentaion David, wouldnt mind seeing this site myself

Posted

Good info David. The bottom line seems to be that 99% of pops in this area have borer holes, but only some of them have decay. The 2 may be linked, but you can't assume decay is present because there are holes, and the boring on its own will not cause stem breakage.

 

If this summer is hot and dry it could be a good year for the hornet moths.

Posted
Good info David. The bottom line seems to be that 99% of pops in this area have borer holes, but only some of them have decay. The 2 may be linked, but you can't assume decay is present because there are holes, and the boring on its own will not cause stem breakage.

 

If this summer is hot and dry it could be a good year for the hornet moths.

 

Very few have decay as far as I could make out Peter.

 

Have you come across or heard of any cross road failures?

 

Would of thought that this would be common due to the sheer numbers of shelter belt/road side stands of pop in this area.

(that is of course 'if' decay is a regular side effect of the presence of the larvae)

 

 

 

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.