Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Komet Morpho


kemlyn
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Hi Frederic,

 

Again i attended the AA show with intention of buying the new morpho harness as my original butterfly harness is due for replacement,just a little threadbare but still serviceable. To my surprise the Morpho is constructed using six shackles,surely this is a not the best way of designing such an important piece of climbing equipment. If shackles are to be used then why dont they have extra thread showing as then to put on nylocs to have a back up just in case these bolts come undone. I already know that these shackles are "waxed" in place,not even a mention of threadlock and which strength. I understand the reason for using these shackles is so then a user can replace parts of the belt. I"m lost as in all these 17 years of climbing i"ve never had to replace parts on a belt. Although someone did say that if you cut the webbing etc it can be easily replaced hence the shackles. Well my way of thinking is if your stupid enough to cut any part of you climbing harness, without causing a serious accident then count yourself lucky when you get down out of the tree all you have to do is just have to replace your belt. I would be interested to know why these shackles have been incorporated into this design, there is a train of thought within the Arb industry on keeping things simple,why do we have to have complex climbing systems,it"s just more components to possibly fail with serious consequences. The original butterfly harness was very good in design, i just think that Morpho has stepped backwards in safety design,of course my opinion here and working on that basis will not be buying the Morpho.

I look forward to your response.

Kind regards

Chris Ward

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
  • 11 months later...

hi all,

 

interesting comments on the morpho. We have a few butterfly harnesses we're just about to replace - used them for years and have only ever retired them, not worn them out! better the devil you know i think, unless someone who is familiar with both could comment to the contrary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to absolutely agree with everything that Chris is saying. The original Butterfly is a well made piece of kit. The Morpho doesn't look as if it would stand upto much. And again if you are lucky enough to get away with cutting through the bridge of your harness then my advice would be get a job strimming hi-ways.

 

Hi Frederic,

 

Again i attended the AA show with intention of buying the new morpho harness as my original butterfly harness is due for replacement,just a little threadbare but still serviceable. To my surprise the Morpho is constructed using six shackles,surely this is a not the best way of designing such an important piece of climbing equipment. If shackles are to be used then why dont they have extra thread showing as then to put on nylocs to have a back up just in case these bolts come undone. I already know that these shackles are "waxed" in place,not even a mention of threadlock and which strength. I understand the reason for using these shackles is so then a user can replace parts of the belt. I"m lost as in all these 17 years of climbing i"ve never had to replace parts on a belt. Although someone did say that if you cut the webbing etc it can be easily replaced hence the shackles. Well my way of thinking is if your stupid enough to cut any part of you climbing harness, without causing a serious accident then count yourself lucky when you get down out of the tree all you have to do is just have to replace your belt. I would be interested to know why these shackles have been incorporated into this design, there is a train of thought within the Arb industry on keeping things simple,why do we have to have complex climbing systems,it"s just more components to possibly fail with serious consequences. The original butterfly harness was very good in design, i just think that Morpho has stepped backwards in safety design,of course my opinion here and working on that basis will not be buying the Morpho.

I look forward to your response.

Kind regards

Chris Ward

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.