Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

u900 mog winch - pto or hydraulic?


andythesquirel
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have an old u900 406 unimog which i am considering fitting a front mounted winch. I will be using it for general pulling/ recovery. I know that hydraulic winches are preferred by most, but i am only a part timer, and so will not be using it every day.

My thoughts are that a pto winch is more likely to be best as it should be cheaper, and as it will be front mounted, and i have no ground anchor etc, i should not need the higher pulling force of a hydraulic.

I would appreciate any thoughts on the best type to fit!

All opinions welcomed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

:icon4:

 

If you fitt a PTO winch you MUST use an overload device like a slip-clutch or spring ratchet clutch or load potentiometer to cut the engine, if you don’t do this it will rapidly overload.

 

If I take my U1600 as an e.g. 4.08:1 PTO gear ratio, that makes 400lbf * 4.08 = 1632lbf @ the PTO shaft.

 

If you useded an old FW525 PTO winch off a Land Rover, it has a 48:1 gear ratio, that would make the winch drum have a twisting force at 1ft from the drum centre of 1632lbf * 48 = 78336lbf (78336lb pull @ 1ft)

 

If it has a 3inch diameter drum, the first layer will be at a radius of 1.5inch , so using leverage if it produces 78336lbf @ 12inch (1ft), it will be 156672lb @ 6inch, 313344lb @ 3inch & 626688lb @ 1.5inch :scared1:

 

Or

12inch / 1.5inch = 8 factor of multiplication of load, so 78336lb * 8 = 626688lb (284341.2kg or 284.34 tonnes)

 

NOTE: power train losses have not been accounted for!! But would be ~90% of input power/force)

 

You have been warned - the forces involved are horrendous. :alberteinstein:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Its designed to be run direct of the Unimog PTO stub so yes just fits on, it has a set of UJ’s which can have a little air clutch # or overload device # built in to the UJ assembly that fits on the PTO stub, the little clutch it acts as the deadman device #.

 

Its worth noting there are 2 flavours of this f64 winch, one with a level winder & one without.

 

# There are then 3 sub types of this winch for each of the above,

A: Basic winch with NO overload device. (self recovery)

B: Basic winch with overload device (in UJ assembly/PTO assembly)

C: Basic winch with overload device & with deadman device (multiplate clutch air cluch/deadman)

 

The subtype A should only be used for self recovery (deboging) of the unimog.

 

Subtype B & C are for self recovery & the pulling of other objects that may cause overload, I.e. pulling out tree stumps with the unimog fixed to something to stop it from being pulled or larger stuck vehicles with the unimog fixed to something to stop it from being pulled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we have a PTO winch, in 540 its nice. Off the top of my head i can't remember what it is, German thats all i know.

 

well worth it. if you can try and get a butt plate as well. turns the front end of teh mog into a small skidder. and a chipper behind

 

Jamie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i had a Ramsey 8000lbs hydraulic winch fitted on my 900 it was a good winch had the benefit of being able to lower as well as pull, that is the only disadvantage with a PTO winch they usually will only pull. i now have a werner pto winch fitted great bit of kit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could i just ask you to explain the level winder?

 

its a fairlead that is driven by a scroll from side to side to lay the wire neatly on the drum which stops the bunching of the wire at the ends or centre of the drum as the scroll that drives it is driven off the drum so 1 drum revolution would be e.g. 18mm of lateral shift if the winch was designed for 18mm rope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was going to fit a winch to whatever it would either be PTO or hydraulic,

 

Experience tells me (regardless of vehicle/make/etc) that

 

PTO have a faster line speed BUT hydraulic is more precise.

 

For arb work hydraulic would be better due to them being more controllable & the pulls are generally not long &/or repetitive unlike forestry ware PTO is better.

 

The other advantage of hydraulic is they are easy to set up with QR’s on the front & rear or are usable via a hydraulic power-pack in remote places or long pipes off the unimog spools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.